Axcelis Technologies Inc (ACLS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Axcelis Technologies Inc (ACLS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $18.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($329.90 Million) in one year. See Axcelis Technologies Inc (ACLS) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Axcelis Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Axcelis Technologies Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Axcelis Technologies Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Axcelis Technologies Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Axcelis Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Axcelis Technologies Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.36x | $118.31 Million | $326.67 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2024 | 0.42x | $140.82 Million | $335.99 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2023 | 0.38x | $156.87 Million | $417.08 Million | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2022 | 0.62x | $215.61 Million | $346.38 Million | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2021 | 0.70x | $150.19 Million | $214.28 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2020 | 0.49x | $69.70 Million | $143.02 Million | ▲ +561.3% |
| 2019 | -0.11x | $-13.59 Million | $128.67 Million | ▼ -131.5% |
| 2018 | 0.34x | $46.97 Million | $140.10 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2017 | 0.42x | $56.28 Million | $134.61 Million | ▲ +578.9% |
| 2016 | -0.09x | $-8.80 Million | $100.78 Million | ▼ -146.9% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $18.26 Million | $98.02 Million | ▲ +168.8% |
| 2014 | -0.27x | $-16.05 Million | $59.30 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-15.04 Million | $57.55 Million | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2012 | -0.29x | $-10.60 Million | $36.08 Million | ▼ -554.6% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $3.53 Million | $54.69 Million | ▲ +182.6% |
| 2010 | -0.08x | $-5.89 Million | $75.31 Million | ▲ +92.1% |
| 2009 | -0.99x | $-33.94 Million | $34.20 Million | ▼ -176.6% |
| 2008 | -0.36x | $-48.72 Million | $135.80 Million | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2007 | -0.17x | $-31.10 Million | $183.92 Million | ▼ -345.8% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $19.02 Million | $276.43 Million | ▲ +233.1% |
| 2005 | -0.05x | $-12.17 Million | $235.40 Million | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $71.63 Million | $245.39 Million | ▲ +221.5% |
| 2003 | -0.24x | $-55.81 Million | $232.34 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | $-55.98 Million | $216.94 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2001 | -0.19x | $-16.58 Million | $88.53 Million | ▼ -134.0% |
| 2000 | 0.55x | $99.68 Million | $180.96 Million | ▲ +213.5% |
| 1999 | -0.49x | $-39.10 Million | $80.54 Million | — |