Axcelis Technologies Inc (ACLS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Axcelis Technologies Inc (ACLS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $18.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($329.90 Million) in one year. Explore how much of Axcelis Technologies Inc's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Axcelis Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Axcelis Technologies Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore how large is Axcelis Technologies Inc's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Axcelis Technologies Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Axcelis Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Axcelis Technologies Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.36x | $118.31 Million | $326.67 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2024 | 0.42x | $140.82 Million | $335.99 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2023 | 0.38x | $156.87 Million | $417.08 Million | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2022 | 0.62x | $215.61 Million | $346.38 Million | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2021 | 0.70x | $150.19 Million | $214.28 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2020 | 0.49x | $69.70 Million | $143.02 Million | ▲ +561.3% |
| 2019 | -0.11x | $-13.59 Million | $128.67 Million | ▼ -131.5% |
| 2018 | 0.34x | $46.97 Million | $140.10 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2017 | 0.42x | $56.28 Million | $134.61 Million | ▲ +578.9% |
| 2016 | -0.09x | $-8.80 Million | $100.78 Million | ▼ -146.9% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $18.26 Million | $98.02 Million | ▲ +168.8% |
| 2014 | -0.27x | $-16.05 Million | $59.30 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-15.04 Million | $57.55 Million | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2012 | -0.29x | $-10.60 Million | $36.08 Million | ▼ -554.6% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $3.53 Million | $54.69 Million | ▲ +182.6% |
| 2010 | -0.08x | $-5.89 Million | $75.31 Million | ▲ +92.1% |
| 2009 | -0.99x | $-33.94 Million | $34.20 Million | ▼ -176.6% |
| 2008 | -0.36x | $-48.72 Million | $135.80 Million | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2007 | -0.17x | $-31.10 Million | $183.92 Million | ▼ -345.8% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $19.02 Million | $276.43 Million | ▲ +233.1% |
| 2005 | -0.05x | $-12.17 Million | $235.40 Million | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $71.63 Million | $245.39 Million | ▲ +221.5% |
| 2003 | -0.24x | $-55.81 Million | $232.34 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | $-55.98 Million | $216.94 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2001 | -0.19x | $-16.58 Million | $88.53 Million | ▼ -134.0% |
| 2000 | 0.55x | $99.68 Million | $180.96 Million | ▲ +213.5% |
| 1999 | -0.49x | $-39.10 Million | $80.54 Million | — |