Axcelis Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Axcelis Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Axcelis Technologies Inc (ACLS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $18.37 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($321.02 Million) in one year. Check Axcelis Technologies Inc (ACLS) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Axcelis Technologies Inc (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Axcelis Technologies Inc from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Axcelis Technologies Inc across 27 annual periods. Check Axcelis Technologies Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Axcelis Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Axcelis Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Axcelis Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ACLS cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.36x | $118.31 Million | $326.67 Million | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2024 | 0.42x | $140.82 Million | $335.99 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2023 | 0.38x | $156.87 Million | $417.08 Million | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2022 | 0.62x | $215.61 Million | $346.38 Million | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2021 | 0.70x | $150.19 Million | $214.28 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2020 | 0.49x | $69.70 Million | $143.02 Million | ▲ +561.3% |
| 2019 | -0.11x | $-13.59 Million | $128.67 Million | ▼ -131.5% |
| 2018 | 0.34x | $46.97 Million | $140.10 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2017 | 0.42x | $56.28 Million | $134.61 Million | ▲ +578.9% |
| 2016 | -0.09x | $-8.80 Million | $100.78 Million | ▼ -146.9% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $18.26 Million | $98.02 Million | ▲ +168.8% |
| 2014 | -0.27x | $-16.05 Million | $59.30 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-15.04 Million | $57.55 Million | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2012 | -0.29x | $-10.60 Million | $36.08 Million | ▼ -554.6% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $3.53 Million | $54.69 Million | ▲ +182.6% |
| 2010 | -0.08x | $-5.89 Million | $75.31 Million | ▲ +92.1% |
| 2009 | -0.99x | $-33.94 Million | $34.20 Million | ▼ -176.6% |
| 2008 | -0.36x | $-48.72 Million | $135.80 Million | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2007 | -0.17x | $-31.10 Million | $183.92 Million | ▼ -345.8% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $19.02 Million | $276.43 Million | ▲ +233.1% |
| 2005 | -0.05x | $-12.17 Million | $235.40 Million | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $71.63 Million | $245.39 Million | ▲ +221.5% |
| 2003 | -0.24x | $-55.81 Million | $232.34 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | $-55.98 Million | $216.94 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2001 | -0.19x | $-16.58 Million | $88.53 Million | ▼ -134.0% |
| 2000 | 0.55x | $99.68 Million | $180.96 Million | ▲ +213.5% |
| 1999 | -0.49x | $-39.10 Million | $80.54 Million | — |