Analog Devices Inc (ADI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Analog Devices Inc (ADI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.37 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.20 Billion) in one year. See ADI free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Analog Devices Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Analog Devices Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore Analog Devices Inc (ADI) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Analog Devices Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Analog Devices Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Analog Devices Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.34x | $4.81 Billion | $14.18 Billion | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $3.85 Billion | $13.05 Billion | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2023 | 0.36x | $4.82 Billion | $13.23 Billion | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2022 | 0.32x | $4.48 Billion | $13.84 Billion | ▲ +69.5% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $2.74 Billion | $14.33 Billion | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $2.01 Billion | $9.47 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $2.25 Billion | $9.68 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $2.44 Billion | $9.17 Billion | ▲ +162.8% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $1.11 Billion | $10.98 Billion | ▼ -77.8% |
| 2016 | 0.46x | $1.28 Billion | $2.80 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2015 | 0.46x | $907.80 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2014 | 0.41x | $871.60 Million | $2.10 Billion | ▼ -25.4% |
| 2013 | 0.56x | $912.35 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2012 | 0.56x | $814.54 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2011 | 0.61x | $900.53 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2010 | 0.88x | $991.17 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▲ +77.8% |
| 2009 | 0.49x | $432.15 Million | $875.14 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2008 | 1.00x | $669.37 Million | $670.73 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2007 | 1.29x | $820.37 Million | $633.81 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2006 | 1.13x | $621.10 Million | $550.84 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2005 | 0.75x | $672.70 Million | $891.71 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2004 | 0.84x | $778.04 Million | $923.70 Million | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2003 | 0.54x | $432.96 Million | $804.80 Million | ▲ +394.9% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $226.13 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▼ -73.7% |
| 2001 | 0.41x | $843.61 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | $704.50 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -52.9% |
| 1999 | 0.71x | $427.30 Million | $602.40 Million | ▲ +131.5% |
| 1998 | 0.31x | $224.70 Million | $733.30 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 1997 | 0.44x | $297.20 Million | $675.80 Million | ▲ +99.8% |
| 1996 | 0.22x | $143.70 Million | $652.90 Million | ▼ -63.8% |
| 1995 | 0.61x | $210.30 Million | $345.60 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 1994 | 0.62x | $183.30 Million | $294.00 Million | ▲ +71.7% |
| 1993 | 0.36x | $89.50 Million | $246.50 Million | ▲ +102.6% |
| 1992 | 0.18x | $33.50 Million | $186.90 Million | ▼ -47.7% |
| 1991 | 0.34x | $51.00 Million | $148.90 Million | ▼ -39.8% |
| 1990 | 0.57x | $82.20 Million | $144.50 Million | ▼ -31.9% |
| 1989 | 0.84x | $74.40 Million | $89.10 Million | — |