Analog Devices Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Analog Devices Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Analog Devices Inc (ADI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of July 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.60 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.87 Billion) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Analog Devices Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Analog Devices Inc (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Analog Devices Inc from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Analog Devices Inc across 37 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Analog Devices Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Analog Devices Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Analog Devices Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Analog Devices Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Analog Devices Inc (ADI) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.34x | $4.81 Billion | $14.18 Billion | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $3.85 Billion | $13.05 Billion | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2023 | 0.36x | $4.82 Billion | $13.23 Billion | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2022 | 0.32x | $4.48 Billion | $13.84 Billion | ▲ +69.5% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $2.74 Billion | $14.33 Billion | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $2.01 Billion | $9.47 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $2.25 Billion | $9.68 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $2.44 Billion | $9.17 Billion | ▲ +162.8% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $1.11 Billion | $10.98 Billion | ▼ -77.8% |
| 2016 | 0.46x | $1.28 Billion | $2.80 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2015 | 0.46x | $907.80 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2014 | 0.41x | $871.60 Million | $2.10 Billion | ▼ -25.4% |
| 2013 | 0.56x | $912.35 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2012 | 0.56x | $814.54 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2011 | 0.61x | $900.53 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2010 | 0.88x | $991.17 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▲ +77.8% |
| 2009 | 0.49x | $432.15 Million | $875.14 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2008 | 1.00x | $669.37 Million | $670.73 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2007 | 1.29x | $820.37 Million | $633.81 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2006 | 1.13x | $621.10 Million | $550.84 Million | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2005 | 0.75x | $672.70 Million | $891.71 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2004 | 0.84x | $778.04 Million | $923.70 Million | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2003 | 0.54x | $432.96 Million | $804.80 Million | ▲ +394.9% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $226.13 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▼ -73.7% |
| 2001 | 0.41x | $843.61 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | $704.50 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▼ -52.9% |
| 1999 | 0.71x | $427.30 Million | $602.40 Million | ▲ +131.5% |
| 1998 | 0.31x | $224.70 Million | $733.30 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 1997 | 0.44x | $297.20 Million | $675.80 Million | ▲ +99.8% |
| 1996 | 0.22x | $143.70 Million | $652.90 Million | ▼ -63.8% |
| 1995 | 0.61x | $210.30 Million | $345.60 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 1994 | 0.62x | $183.30 Million | $294.00 Million | ▲ +71.7% |
| 1993 | 0.36x | $89.50 Million | $246.50 Million | ▲ +102.6% |
| 1992 | 0.18x | $33.50 Million | $186.90 Million | ▼ -47.7% |
| 1991 | 0.34x | $51.00 Million | $148.90 Million | ▼ -39.8% |
| 1990 | 0.57x | $82.20 Million | $144.50 Million | ▼ -31.9% |
| 1989 | 0.84x | $74.40 Million | $89.10 Million | — |