Meta Financial Group Inc (CASH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Meta Financial Group Inc (CASH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $232.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.26 Billion) in one year. See Meta Financial Group Inc free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Meta Financial Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Meta Financial Group Inc across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CASH cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Meta Financial Group Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Meta Financial Group Inc. Check CASH cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $450.62 Million | $6.31 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $453.54 Million | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +53.5% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $303.11 Million | $6.88 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $268.81 Million | $6.10 Billion | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $581.64 Million | $5.82 Billion | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $467.22 Million | $5.24 Billion | ▲ +149.0% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $191.01 Million | $5.34 Billion | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $137.75 Million | $5.09 Billion | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $120.00 Million | $4.79 Billion | ▲ +166995.6% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | $55.00K | $3.67 Billion | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $48.96 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $25.81 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▲ +192.2% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-23.07 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -128.0% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $79.99 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +190.9% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $21.86 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2010 | 0.04x | $34.57 Million | $957.72 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | $22.90 Million | $787.43 Million | ▲ +158.5% |
| 2008 | -0.05x | $-33.06 Million | $664.50 Million | ▼ -1384.0% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | $2.47 Million | $637.98 Million | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $8.38 Million | $695.82 Million | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $5.48 Million | $732.88 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $8.77 Million | $733.52 Million | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $7.25 Million | $729.25 Million | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $3.58 Million | $563.06 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $3.49 Million | $479.46 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $5.86 Million | $465.56 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $6.50 Million | $471.40 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $5.40 Million | $376.10 Million | ▲ +159.2% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $2.00 Million | $361.10 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $3.50 Million | $344.80 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 1995 | 0.01x | $2.50 Million | $226.20 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 1994 | 0.01x | $2.90 Million | $239.40 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 1993 | 0.03x | $4.00 Million | $127.40 Million | — |