Meta Financial Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Meta Financial Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Meta Financial Group Inc (CASH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $232.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.26 Billion) in one year. Check CASH cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Meta Financial Group Inc (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Meta Financial Group Inc from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Meta Financial Group Inc across 33 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Meta Financial Group Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Meta Financial Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Meta Financial Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Meta Financial Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CASH cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $450.62 Million | $6.31 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $453.54 Million | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +53.5% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $303.11 Million | $6.88 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $268.81 Million | $6.10 Billion | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $581.64 Million | $5.82 Billion | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $467.22 Million | $5.24 Billion | ▲ +149.0% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $191.01 Million | $5.34 Billion | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2018 | 0.03x | $137.75 Million | $5.09 Billion | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $120.00 Million | $4.79 Billion | ▲ +166995.6% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | $55.00K | $3.67 Billion | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $48.96 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $25.81 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▲ +192.2% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-23.07 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -128.0% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $79.99 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +190.9% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $21.86 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2010 | 0.04x | $34.57 Million | $957.72 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | $22.90 Million | $787.43 Million | ▲ +158.5% |
| 2008 | -0.05x | $-33.06 Million | $664.50 Million | ▼ -1384.0% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | $2.47 Million | $637.98 Million | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $8.38 Million | $695.82 Million | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $5.48 Million | $732.88 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $8.77 Million | $733.52 Million | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $7.25 Million | $729.25 Million | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $3.58 Million | $563.06 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $3.49 Million | $479.46 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $5.86 Million | $465.56 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $6.50 Million | $471.40 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $5.40 Million | $376.10 Million | ▲ +159.2% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $2.00 Million | $361.10 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $3.50 Million | $344.80 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 1995 | 0.01x | $2.50 Million | $226.20 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 1994 | 0.01x | $2.90 Million | $239.40 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 1993 | 0.03x | $4.00 Million | $127.40 Million | — |