Meta Financial Group Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Meta Financial Group Inc working capital to net assets ratio. Meta Financial Group Inc (CASH) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 19.7% as of March 2026. Working capital of $167.73 Million (current assets of $193.73 Million minus current liabilities of $26.00 Million) is measured against net assets of $850.68 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check tangible equity quality of Meta Financial Group Inc to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Meta Financial Group Inc (1993–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Meta Financial Group Inc from 1993 to 2025. This chart shows how Meta Financial Group Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 33 annual periods from 1993 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 19.7%, reflecting working capital of $167.73 Million against net assets of $850.68 Million USD. See Meta Financial Group Inc (CASH) liquidity interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Meta Financial Group Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Meta Financial Group Inc working capital to net assets ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Meta Financial Group Inc from 1993 to 2025, covering 33 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Meta Financial Group Inc asset portfolio.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -538.2% | $-4.61 Billion | $857.45 Million | $1.28 Billion | $5.90 Billion | ▼ -41.6 pp |
| 2024 | -496.5% | $-4.17 Billion | $839.61 Million | $2.08 Billion | $6.25 Billion | ▲ +189.7 pp |
| 2023 | -686.2% | $-4.46 Billion | $650.62 Million | $2.39 Billion | $6.85 Billion | ▼ -175.3 pp |
| 2022 | -510.9% | $-3.30 Billion | $645.14 Million | $2.50 Billion | $5.80 Billion | ▼ -645.9 pp |
| 2021 | 135.1% | $1.18 Billion | $871.88 Million | $1.18 Billion | $579.00K | ▼ -13.2 pp |
| 2020 | 148.3% | $1.26 Billion | $847.31 Million | $1.26 Billion | $1.92 Million | ▲ +631.3 pp |
| 2019 | -483.0% | $-4.08 Billion | $843.96 Million | $1.05 Billion | $5.12 Billion | ▼ -33.1 pp |
| 2018 | -449.9% | $-3.36 Billion | $747.73 Million | $1.63 Billion | $5.00 Billion | ▲ +76.2 pp |
| 2017 | -526.1% | $-2.29 Billion | $434.50 Million | $2.42 Billion | $4.71 Billion | ▲ +30.2 pp |
| 2016 | -556.3% | $-1.86 Billion | $334.98 Million | $1.71 Billion | $3.57 Billion | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2015 | -554.1% | $-1.50 Billion | $271.33 Million | $735.21 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▲ +203.6 pp |
| 2014 | -757.7% | $-1.32 Billion | $174.80 Million | $537.10 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▲ +66.7 pp |
| 2013 | -824.4% | $-1.18 Billion | $142.98 Million | $352.57 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▼ -216.5 pp |
| 2012 | -607.9% | $-886.65 Million | $145.86 Million | $593.36 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▲ +483.0 pp |
| 2011 | -1090.9% | $-878.98 Million | $80.58 Million | $290.97 Million | $1.17 Billion | ▲ +43.7 pp |
| 2010 | -1134.6% | $-817.40 Million | $72.04 Million | $104.03 Million | $921.43 Million | ▲ +244.7 pp |
| 2009 | -1379.3% | $-653.04 Million | $47.34 Million | $20.01 Million | $673.05 Million | ▼ -285.1 pp |
| 2008 | -1094.3% | $-500.44 Million | $45.73 Million | $17.44 Million | $517.88 Million | ▼ -37.0 pp |
| 2007 | -1057.3% | $-508.54 Million | $48.10 Million | $15.51 Million | $524.04 Million | ▼ -52.8 pp |
| 2006 | -1004.5% | $-453.01 Million | $45.10 Million | $111.55 Million | $564.55 Million | ▲ +359.7 pp |
| 2005 | -1364.1% | $-586.02 Million | $42.96 Million | $18.61 Million | $604.63 Million | ▼ -131.2 pp |
| 2004 | -1232.9% | $-582.86 Million | $47.27 Million | $12.79 Million | $595.65 Million | ▲ +402.8 pp |
| 2003 | -1635.7% | $-703.86 Million | $43.03 Million | $13.69 Million | $717.55 Million | ▼ -421.5 pp |
| 2002 | -1214.2% | $-541.40 Million | $44.59 Million | $11.70 Million | $553.10 Million | ▼ -171.5 pp |
| 2001 | -1042.8% | $-455.98 Million | $43.73 Million | $13.52 Million | $469.50 Million | ▲ +85.0 pp |
| 2000 | -1127.8% | $-451.51 Million | $40.04 Million | $12.14 Million | $463.65 Million | ▼ -222.3 pp |
| 1999 | -905.5% | $-360.40 Million | $39.80 Million | $10.40 Million | $370.80 Million | ▼ -199.4 pp |
| 1998 | -706.1% | $-298.70 Million | $42.30 Million | $11.70 Million | $310.40 Million | ▲ +71.1 pp |
| 1997 | -777.2% | $-338.10 Million | $43.50 Million | $18.50 Million | $356.60 Million | ▼ -107.8 pp |
| 1996 | -669.4% | $-289.20 Million | $43.20 Million | $19.60 Million | $308.80 Million | ▼ -97.1 pp |
| 1995 | -572.4% | $-217.50 Million | $38.00 Million | $7.30 Million | $224.80 Million | ▼ -84.5 pp |
| 1994 | -487.9% | $-169.30 Million | $34.70 Million | $8.60 Million | $177.90 Million | ▼ -176.5 pp |
| 1993 | -311.4% | $-104.00 Million | $33.40 Million | $22.00 Million | $126.00 Million | — |