Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -2.11x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.47 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities ($698.60K) in one year. Check CELZ operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (2006–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc from 2006 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc across 20 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2006–2025)
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2006 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -20.56x | $-5.86 Million | $284.88K | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2024 | -16.18x | $-5.30 Million | $327.64K | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2023 | -21.62x | $-8.03 Million | $371.39K | ▼ -820.9% |
| 2022 | -2.35x | $-7.80 Million | $3.32 Million | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2021 | -2.11x | $-2.22 Million | $1.05 Million | ▼ -19569.2% |
| 2020 | -0.01x | $-434.56K | $40.52 Million | ▲ +92.4% |
| 2019 | -0.14x | $-1.21 Million | $8.60 Million | ▲ +40.1% |
| 2018 | -0.24x | $-1.05 Million | $4.47 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 2017 | -0.36x | $-889.62K | $2.44 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2016 | -0.93x | $-445.23K | $480.30K | ▼ -1065.3% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | $-14.64K | $184.02K | ▲ +29.3% |
| 2014 | -0.11x | $-17.32K | $154.00K | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2013 | -0.18x | $-22.91K | $125.41K | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2012 | -0.17x | $-16.77K | $99.32K | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2011 | -0.19x | $-13.96K | $75.27K | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2010 | -0.28x | $-13.66K | $48.52K | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2009 | -0.91x | $-30.74K | $33.93K | ▲ +98.8% |
| 2008 | -76.73x | $-57.16K | $745.00 | ▼ -5438.9% |
| 2007 | -1.39x | $-12.86K | $9.28K | ▼ -1127.1% |
| 2006 | 0.13x | $1.14K | $8.45K | — |