Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -4.30x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.32 Million could theoretically repay -4% of its total liabilities ($307.65K) in one year. Check Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2006–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc across 20 annual periods. Also explore how large is Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (2006–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -20.56x | $-5.86 Million | $284.88K | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2024 | -16.18x | $-5.30 Million | $327.64K | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2023 | -21.62x | $-8.03 Million | $371.39K | ▼ -820.9% |
| 2022 | -2.35x | $-7.80 Million | $3.32 Million | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2021 | -2.11x | $-2.22 Million | $1.05 Million | ▼ -19569.2% |
| 2020 | -0.01x | $-434.56K | $40.52 Million | ▲ +92.4% |
| 2019 | -0.14x | $-1.21 Million | $8.60 Million | ▲ +40.1% |
| 2018 | -0.24x | $-1.05 Million | $4.47 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 2017 | -0.36x | $-889.62K | $2.44 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2016 | -0.93x | $-445.23K | $480.30K | ▼ -1065.3% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | $-14.64K | $184.02K | ▲ +29.3% |
| 2014 | -0.11x | $-17.32K | $154.00K | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2013 | -0.18x | $-22.91K | $125.41K | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2012 | -0.17x | $-16.77K | $99.32K | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2011 | -0.19x | $-13.96K | $75.27K | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2010 | -0.28x | $-13.66K | $48.52K | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2009 | -0.91x | $-30.74K | $33.93K | ▲ +98.8% |
| 2008 | -76.73x | $-57.16K | $745.00 | ▼ -5438.9% |
| 2007 | -1.39x | $-12.86K | $9.28K | ▼ -1127.1% |
| 2006 | 0.13x | $1.14K | $8.45K | — |