Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -4.30x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.32 Million could theoretically repay -4% of its total liabilities ($307.65K) in one year. See Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2006–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc across 20 annual periods. Also explore CELZ net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (2006–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -20.56x | $-5.86 Million | $284.88K | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2024 | -16.18x | $-5.30 Million | $327.64K | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2023 | -21.62x | $-8.03 Million | $371.39K | ▼ -820.9% |
| 2022 | -2.35x | $-7.80 Million | $3.32 Million | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2021 | -2.11x | $-2.22 Million | $1.05 Million | ▼ -19569.2% |
| 2020 | -0.01x | $-434.56K | $40.52 Million | ▲ +92.4% |
| 2019 | -0.14x | $-1.21 Million | $8.60 Million | ▲ +40.1% |
| 2018 | -0.24x | $-1.05 Million | $4.47 Million | ▲ +35.5% |
| 2017 | -0.36x | $-889.62K | $2.44 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2016 | -0.93x | $-445.23K | $480.30K | ▼ -1065.3% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | $-14.64K | $184.02K | ▲ +29.3% |
| 2014 | -0.11x | $-17.32K | $154.00K | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2013 | -0.18x | $-22.91K | $125.41K | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2012 | -0.17x | $-16.77K | $99.32K | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2011 | -0.19x | $-13.96K | $75.27K | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2010 | -0.28x | $-13.66K | $48.52K | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2009 | -0.91x | $-30.74K | $33.93K | ▲ +98.8% |
| 2008 | -76.73x | $-57.16K | $745.00 | ▼ -5438.9% |
| 2007 | -1.39x | $-12.86K | $9.28K | ▼ -1127.1% |
| 2006 | 0.13x | $1.14K | $8.45K | — |