Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 93.8% as of March 2026. Working capital of $5.75 Million (current assets of $6.06 Million minus current liabilities of $307.65K) is measured against net assets of $6.13 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc net asset quality index to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc Working Capital to Net Assets (2006–2025)
This chart shows how Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 20 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 93.8%, reflecting working capital of $5.75 Million against net assets of $6.13 Million USD. Check tangible equity quality of Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (2006–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc from 2006 to 2025, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc stock valuation.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 94.5% | $7.11 Million | $7.52 Million | $7.40 Million | $284.88K | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2024 | 91.6% | $5.81 Million | $6.34 Million | $6.14 Million | $327.64K | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2023 | 95.7% | $9.90 Million | $10.34 Million | $10.27 Million | $371.39K | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2022 | 97.2% | $15.43 Million | $15.86 Million | $18.75 Million | $3.32 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2021 | 94.8% | $9.69 Million | $10.22 Million | $10.74 Million | $1.05 Million | ▼ -6.8 pp |
| 2020 | 101.6% | $-40.42 Million | $-39.80 Million | $98.01K | $40.52 Million | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2019 | 105.4% | $-8.51 Million | $-8.07 Million | $94.25K | $8.60 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2018 | 104.1% | $-4.16 Million | $-3.99 Million | $313.66K | $4.47 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2017 | 108.1% | $-2.42 Million | $-2.24 Million | $18.50K | $2.44 Million | ▼ -39.0 pp |
| 2016 | 147.0% | $-232.00K | $-157.79K | $221.87K | $453.86K | ▲ +61.3 pp |
| 2015 | 85.7% | $-157.60K | $-183.80K | $216.00 | $157.82K | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | $-153.04K | $-153.04K | $954.00 | $154.00K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | $-125.03K | $-125.03K | $374.00 | $125.41K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | $-97.75K | $-97.75K | $1.57K | $99.32K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | $-72.16K | $-72.16K | $3.10K | $75.27K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | $-48.11K | $-48.11K | $414.00 | $48.52K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $-30.85K | $-30.85K | $3.08K | $33.93K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | $757.00 | $757.00 | $1.50K | $745.00 | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $26.35K | $26.35K | $35.63K | $9.28K | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2006 | 101.0% | $21.09K | $20.89K | $29.34K | $8.24K | — |