Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 93.8% as of March 2026. Working capital of $5.75 Million (current assets of $6.06 Million minus current liabilities of $307.65K) is measured against net assets of $6.13 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See CELZ financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc Working Capital to Net Assets (2006–2025)
This chart shows how Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 20 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 93.8%, reflecting working capital of $5.75 Million against net assets of $6.13 Million USD. See CELZ defensive asset coverage days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (2006–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc from 2006 to 2025, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see CELZ company net worth.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 94.5% | $7.11 Million | $7.52 Million | $7.40 Million | $284.88K | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2024 | 91.6% | $5.81 Million | $6.34 Million | $6.14 Million | $327.64K | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2023 | 95.7% | $9.90 Million | $10.34 Million | $10.27 Million | $371.39K | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2022 | 97.2% | $15.43 Million | $15.86 Million | $18.75 Million | $3.32 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2021 | 94.8% | $9.69 Million | $10.22 Million | $10.74 Million | $1.05 Million | ▼ -6.8 pp |
| 2020 | 101.6% | $-40.42 Million | $-39.80 Million | $98.01K | $40.52 Million | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2019 | 105.4% | $-8.51 Million | $-8.07 Million | $94.25K | $8.60 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2018 | 104.1% | $-4.16 Million | $-3.99 Million | $313.66K | $4.47 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2017 | 108.1% | $-2.42 Million | $-2.24 Million | $18.50K | $2.44 Million | ▼ -39.0 pp |
| 2016 | 147.0% | $-232.00K | $-157.79K | $221.87K | $453.86K | ▲ +61.3 pp |
| 2015 | 85.7% | $-157.60K | $-183.80K | $216.00 | $157.82K | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | $-153.04K | $-153.04K | $954.00 | $154.00K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | $-125.03K | $-125.03K | $374.00 | $125.41K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | $-97.75K | $-97.75K | $1.57K | $99.32K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | $-72.16K | $-72.16K | $3.10K | $75.27K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | $-48.11K | $-48.11K | $414.00 | $48.52K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $-30.85K | $-30.85K | $3.08K | $33.93K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | $757.00 | $757.00 | $1.50K | $745.00 | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $26.35K | $26.35K | $35.63K | $9.28K | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2006 | 101.0% | $21.09K | $20.89K | $29.34K | $8.24K | — |