Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc Net Asset Quality Index
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc net asset quality index. Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 92.6% as of June 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $9.38 Million minus total liabilities of $698.60K yields net assets of $8.68 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (2006–2025)
Net asset quality index of Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc from 2006 to 2025. This chart shows how Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 20 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of June 2026, the index stands at 92.6%, representing net assets of $8.68 Million against total assets of $9.38 Million USD. Check CELZ tangible net assets ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc Net Asset Quality Index by Year (2006–2025)
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc net asset quality index by year from 2006 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc from 2006 to 2025, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 96.4% | $7.52 Million | $7.81 Million | $284.88K | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2024 | 95.1% | $6.34 Million | $6.67 Million | $327.64K | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2023 | 96.5% | $10.34 Million | $10.72 Million | $371.39K | ▲ +13.8 pp |
| 2022 | 82.7% | $15.86 Million | $19.19 Million | $3.32 Million | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2021 | 90.7% | $10.22 Million | $11.27 Million | $1.05 Million | ▲ +5636.0 pp |
| 2020 | -5545.3% | $-39.80 Million | $717.77K | $40.52 Million | ▼ -4024.7 pp |
| 2019 | -1520.6% | $-8.07 Million | $530.80K | $8.60 Million | ▼ -683.5 pp |
| 2018 | -837.2% | $-3.99 Million | $477.16K | $4.47 Million | ▲ +263.6 pp |
| 2017 | -1100.8% | $-2.24 Million | $203.15K | $2.44 Million | ▼ -1051.8 pp |
| 2016 | -48.9% | $-157.79K | $322.51K | $480.30K | ▲ +85045.5 pp |
| 2015 | -85094.4% | $-183.80K | $216.00 | $184.02K | ▼ -69052.2 pp |
| 2014 | -16042.2% | $-153.04K | $954.00 | $154.00K | ▲ +17388.5 pp |
| 2013 | -33430.7% | $-125.03K | $374.00 | $125.41K | ▼ -27196.8 pp |
| 2012 | -6234.0% | $-97.75K | $1.57K | $99.32K | ▼ -3909.9 pp |
| 2011 | -2324.1% | $-72.16K | $3.10K | $75.27K | ▲ +9296.4 pp |
| 2010 | -11620.5% | $-48.11K | $414.00 | $48.52K | ▼ -10617.2 pp |
| 2009 | -1003.3% | $-30.85K | $3.08K | $33.93K | ▼ -1053.7 pp |
| 2008 | 50.4% | $757.00 | $1.50K | $745.00 | ▼ -23.6 pp |
| 2007 | 74.0% | $26.35K | $35.63K | $9.28K | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2006 | 71.2% | $20.89K | $29.34K | $8.45K | — |