Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) — Net Asset Quality Index
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 92.6% as of June 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $9.38 Million minus total liabilities of $698.60K yields net assets of $8.68 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ) financial obligations for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2006–2025)
This chart shows how Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 20 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of June 2026, the index stands at 92.6%, representing net assets of $8.68 Million against total assets of $9.38 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see CELZ stock market capitalisation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (2006–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc from 2006 to 2025, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. See what is Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc's book value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 96.4% | $7.52 Million | $7.81 Million | $284.88K | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2024 | 95.1% | $6.34 Million | $6.67 Million | $327.64K | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2023 | 96.5% | $10.34 Million | $10.72 Million | $371.39K | ▲ +13.8 pp |
| 2022 | 82.7% | $15.86 Million | $19.19 Million | $3.32 Million | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2021 | 90.7% | $10.22 Million | $11.27 Million | $1.05 Million | ▲ +5636.0 pp |
| 2020 | -5545.3% | $-39.80 Million | $717.77K | $40.52 Million | ▼ -4024.7 pp |
| 2019 | -1520.6% | $-8.07 Million | $530.80K | $8.60 Million | ▼ -683.5 pp |
| 2018 | -837.2% | $-3.99 Million | $477.16K | $4.47 Million | ▲ +263.6 pp |
| 2017 | -1100.8% | $-2.24 Million | $203.15K | $2.44 Million | ▼ -1051.8 pp |
| 2016 | -48.9% | $-157.79K | $322.51K | $480.30K | ▲ +85045.5 pp |
| 2015 | -85094.4% | $-183.80K | $216.00 | $184.02K | ▼ -69052.2 pp |
| 2014 | -16042.2% | $-153.04K | $954.00 | $154.00K | ▲ +17388.5 pp |
| 2013 | -33430.7% | $-125.03K | $374.00 | $125.41K | ▼ -27196.8 pp |
| 2012 | -6234.0% | $-97.75K | $1.57K | $99.32K | ▼ -3909.9 pp |
| 2011 | -2324.1% | $-72.16K | $3.10K | $75.27K | ▲ +9296.4 pp |
| 2010 | -11620.5% | $-48.11K | $414.00 | $48.52K | ▼ -10617.2 pp |
| 2009 | -1003.3% | $-30.85K | $3.08K | $33.93K | ▼ -1053.7 pp |
| 2008 | 50.4% | $757.00 | $1.50K | $745.00 | ▼ -23.6 pp |
| 2007 | 74.0% | $26.35K | $35.63K | $9.28K | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2006 | 71.2% | $20.89K | $29.34K | $8.45K | — |