Core AI Holdings (CHAI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Core AI Holdings (CHAI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.23x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.35 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($22.83 Million) in one year. Check Core AI Holdings total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Core AI Holdings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Core AI Holdings across 25 annual periods. Check CHAI cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Core AI Holdings (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Core AI Holdings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Core AI Holdings generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.65x | $-6.65 Million | $10.30 Million | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2024 | -1.38x | $-15.08 Million | $10.97 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2023 | -1.44x | $-8.34 Million | $5.81 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2022 | -2.01x | $-13.85 Million | $6.90 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2021 | -1.31x | $-16.02 Million | $12.19 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2020 | -1.02x | $-12.76 Million | $12.53 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2019 | -0.88x | $-6.73 Million | $7.63 Million | ▼ -251.4% |
| 2018 | -0.25x | $-2.20 Million | $8.77 Million | ▲ +68.6% |
| 2017 | -0.80x | $-4.60 Million | $5.76 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2016 | -0.79x | $-1.71 Million | $2.18 Million | ▲ +45.6% |
| 2015 | -1.45x | $-2.73 Million | $1.88 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2014 | -5.50x | $-128.10K | $23.29K | ▼ -2759.2% |
| 2013 | -0.19x | $-165.28K | $859.00K | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2012 | -0.29x | $-259.40K | $894.49K | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2011 | -0.49x | $-181.59K | $373.89K | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2010 | -1.91x | $-212.36K | $111.08K | ▲ +92.8% |
| 2009 | -26.72x | $-706.07K | $26.42K | ▼ -41573.2% |
| 2008 | -0.06x | $-39.07K | $609.29K | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-102.83K | $472.42K | ▲ +78.9% |
| 2006 | -1.03x | $-188.03K | $182.34K | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2005 | -1.37x | $-98.94K | $72.12K | ▲ +82.6% |
| 2004 | -7.90x | $-144.40K | $18.28K | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2003 | -5.21x | $-117.07K | $22.46K | ▼ -249.1% |
| 2002 | -1.49x | $-83.23K | $55.74K | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2001 | -12.55x | $-113.22K | $9.02K | — |