Core AI Holdings (CHAI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Core AI Holdings (CHAI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $74.07K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.46 Million) in one year. Check Core AI Holdings cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Core AI Holdings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Core AI Holdings across 25 annual periods. See CHAI FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Core AI Holdings (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Core AI Holdings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Core AI Holdings generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.65x | $-6.65 Million | $10.30 Million | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2024 | -1.38x | $-15.08 Million | $10.97 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2023 | -1.44x | $-8.34 Million | $5.81 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2022 | -2.01x | $-13.85 Million | $6.90 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2021 | -1.31x | $-16.02 Million | $12.19 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2020 | -1.02x | $-12.76 Million | $12.53 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2019 | -0.88x | $-6.73 Million | $7.63 Million | ▼ -251.4% |
| 2018 | -0.25x | $-2.20 Million | $8.77 Million | ▲ +68.6% |
| 2017 | -0.80x | $-4.60 Million | $5.76 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2016 | -0.79x | $-1.71 Million | $2.18 Million | ▲ +45.6% |
| 2015 | -1.45x | $-2.73 Million | $1.88 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2014 | -5.50x | $-128.10K | $23.29K | ▼ -2759.2% |
| 2013 | -0.19x | $-165.28K | $859.00K | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2012 | -0.29x | $-259.40K | $894.49K | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2011 | -0.49x | $-181.59K | $373.89K | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2010 | -1.91x | $-212.36K | $111.08K | ▲ +92.8% |
| 2009 | -26.72x | $-706.07K | $26.42K | ▼ -41573.2% |
| 2008 | -0.06x | $-39.07K | $609.29K | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-102.83K | $472.42K | ▲ +78.9% |
| 2006 | -1.03x | $-188.03K | $182.34K | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2005 | -1.37x | $-98.94K | $72.12K | ▲ +82.6% |
| 2004 | -7.90x | $-144.40K | $18.28K | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2003 | -5.21x | $-117.07K | $22.46K | ▼ -249.1% |
| 2002 | -1.49x | $-83.23K | $55.74K | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2001 | -12.55x | $-113.22K | $9.02K | — |