Core AI Holdings (CHAI) — Net Asset Quality Index
Core AI Holdings (CHAI) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -6.8% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $7.92 Million minus total liabilities of $8.46 Million yields net assets of $-540.23K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Core AI Holdings strategic capital allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Core AI Holdings Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2025)
This chart shows how Core AI Holdings's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 25 annual periods from 2001 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at -6.8%, representing net assets of $-540.23K against total assets of $7.92 Million USD. Explore how much does Core AI Holdings reinvest in capital to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Core AI Holdings (2001–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Core AI Holdings from 2001 to 2025, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Core AI Holdings market cap and net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23.1% | $3.10 Million | $13.41 Million | $10.30 Million | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2024 | 26.3% | $3.92 Million | $14.89 Million | $10.97 Million | ▼ -36.2 pp |
| 2023 | 62.6% | $9.71 Million | $15.51 Million | $5.81 Million | ▲ +5.3 pp |
| 2022 | 57.2% | $9.24 Million | $16.14 Million | $6.90 Million | ▲ +36.6 pp |
| 2021 | 20.6% | $3.17 Million | $15.36 Million | $12.19 Million | ▼ -47.8 pp |
| 2020 | 68.4% | $27.17 Million | $39.70 Million | $12.53 Million | ▲ +15.9 pp |
| 2019 | 52.6% | $8.45 Million | $16.08 Million | $7.63 Million | ▲ +19.7 pp |
| 2018 | 32.8% | $4.29 Million | $13.06 Million | $8.77 Million | ▼ -34.0 pp |
| 2017 | 66.9% | $11.64 Million | $17.40 Million | $5.76 Million | ▼ -6.3 pp |
| 2016 | 73.2% | $5.94 Million | $8.12 Million | $2.18 Million | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2015 | 70.2% | $4.43 Million | $6.32 Million | $1.88 Million | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 2014 | 84.5% | $126.64K | $149.92K | $23.29K | ▲ +120.5 pp |
| 2013 | -36.0% | $-227.34K | $631.65K | $859.00K | ▼ -88.1 pp |
| 2012 | 52.1% | $971.45K | $1.87 Million | $894.49K | ▼ -34.6 pp |
| 2011 | 86.7% | $2.43 Million | $2.80 Million | $373.89K | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2010 | 90.6% | $1.07 Million | $1.18 Million | $111.08K | ▼ -6.8 pp |
| 2009 | 97.4% | $977.68K | $1.00 Million | $26.42K | ▲ +84.6 pp |
| 2008 | 12.8% | $89.41K | $698.71K | $609.29K | ▼ -31.9 pp |
| 2007 | 44.7% | $381.42K | $853.83K | $472.42K | ▼ -40.2 pp |
| 2006 | 84.9% | $1.03 Million | $1.21 Million | $182.34K | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2005 | 87.6% | $510.50K | $582.62K | $72.12K | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2004 | 91.5% | $197.85K | $216.12K | $18.28K | ▲ +2174.1 pp |
| 2003 | -2082.5% | $-21.43K | $1.03K | $22.46K | ▼ -2121.4 pp |
| 2002 | 38.9% | $35.49K | $91.23K | $55.74K | ▼ -59.6 pp |
| 2001 | 98.5% | $596.40K | $605.42K | $9.02K | — |