Core AI Holdings (CHAI) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Core AI Holdings (CHAI) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 201.8% as of March 2026. Working capital of $-1.09 Million (current assets of $7.37 Million minus current liabilities of $8.46 Million) is measured against net assets of $-540.23K. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See CHAI defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Core AI Holdings Working Capital to Net Assets (2001–2025)
This chart shows how Core AI Holdings's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 25 annual periods from 2001 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 201.8%, reflecting working capital of $-1.09 Million against net assets of $-540.23K USD. Check CHAI goodwill-adjusted equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Core AI Holdings (2001–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Core AI Holdings from 2001 to 2025, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see CHAI current and non-current assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 81.1% | $2.52 Million | $3.10 Million | $12.82 Million | $10.30 Million | ▲ +207.3 pp |
| 2024 | -126.2% | $-4.95 Million | $3.92 Million | $5.68 Million | $10.63 Million | ▼ -139.4 pp |
| 2023 | 13.2% | $1.28 Million | $9.71 Million | $6.70 Million | $5.42 Million | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 2022 | 17.8% | $1.64 Million | $9.24 Million | $7.91 Million | $6.27 Million | ▲ +44.7 pp |
| 2021 | -26.9% | $-852.60K | $3.17 Million | $7.88 Million | $8.74 Million | ▼ -91.2 pp |
| 2020 | 64.3% | $17.48 Million | $27.17 Million | $29.49 Million | $12.01 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2019 | 60.7% | $5.13 Million | $8.45 Million | $8.41 Million | $3.28 Million | ▲ +11.6 pp |
| 2018 | 49.1% | $2.11 Million | $4.29 Million | $6.77 Million | $4.66 Million | ▼ -16.8 pp |
| 2017 | 66.0% | $7.68 Million | $11.64 Million | $10.51 Million | $2.83 Million | ▲ +15.2 pp |
| 2016 | 50.8% | $3.02 Million | $5.94 Million | $4.77 Million | $1.75 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2015 | 52.5% | $2.33 Million | $4.43 Million | $4.21 Million | $1.88 Million | ▼ -44.2 pp |
| 2014 | 96.7% | $122.50K | $126.64K | $145.79K | $23.29K | ▼ -164.7 pp |
| 2013 | 261.4% | $-594.37K | $-227.34K | $10.17K | $604.54K | ▲ +324.3 pp |
| 2012 | -62.9% | $-611.06K | $971.45K | $37.27K | $648.33K | ▼ -54.0 pp |
| 2011 | -8.9% | $-215.17K | $2.43 Million | $158.72K | $373.89K | ▼ -15.6 pp |
| 2010 | 6.8% | $72.19K | $1.07 Million | $183.27K | $111.08K | ▼ -14.4 pp |
| 2009 | 21.2% | $207.24K | $977.68K | $233.66K | $26.42K | ▲ +657.1 pp |
| 2008 | -635.9% | $-568.53K | $89.41K | $40.76K | $609.29K | ▼ -513.5 pp |
| 2007 | -122.4% | $-466.79K | $381.42K | $5.63K | $472.42K | ▼ -107.9 pp |
| 2006 | -14.5% | $-148.58K | $1.03 Million | $33.76K | $182.34K | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2005 | -12.4% | $-63.15K | $510.50K | $8.97K | $72.12K | ▼ -39.0 pp |
| 2004 | 26.6% | $52.68K | $197.85K | $70.95K | $18.28K | ▼ -73.4 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $-21.43K | $-21.43K | $1.03K | $22.46K | ▲ +172.5 pp |
| 2002 | -72.5% | $-25.71K | $35.49K | $30.02K | $55.74K | ▼ -87.5 pp |
| 2001 | 15.1% | $89.80K | $596.40K | $98.82K | $9.02K | — |