Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-11.89 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($343.60 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Climb Global Solutions to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Climb Global Solutions Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Climb Global Solutions across 32 annual periods. Also explore CLMB total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Climb Global Solutions (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Climb Global Solutions. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Climb Global Solutions worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $16.60 Million | $343.65 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $33.74 Million | $378.59 Million | ▼ -44.9% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $42.12 Million | $260.33 Million | ▲ +507.6% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $4.56 Million | $171.28 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $4.71 Million | $138.34 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 2020 | 0.31x | $37.97 Million | $120.82 Million | ▲ +683.7% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $3.25 Million | $81.03 Million | ▼ -80.6% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $13.90 Million | $67.40 Million | ▲ +753.3% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | $-2.02 Million | $64.01 Million | ▼ -365.5% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-516.00K | $76.09 Million | ▼ -104.6% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $8.19 Million | $55.42 Million | ▲ +42.4% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $5.75 Million | $55.41 Million | ▼ -39.8% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $10.34 Million | $60.04 Million | ▲ +202.6% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $3.38 Million | $59.32 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $3.70 Million | $45.93 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $2.92 Million | $42.00 Million | ▲ +103.7% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | $999.00K | $29.31 Million | ▲ +264.9% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-488.00K | $23.60 Million | ▼ -112.7% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $5.25 Million | $32.26 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $6.08 Million | $35.98 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $5.45 Million | $26.27 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 2004 | 0.12x | $1.93 Million | $16.42 Million | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $943.00K | $9.29 Million | ▲ +279.1% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $208.00K | $7.77 Million | ▲ +736.3% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $32.00K | $10.00 Million | ▼ -97.9% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $2.23 Million | $14.95 Million | ▲ +508.0% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $1.50 Million | $61.00 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $2.90 Million | $68.70 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $6.20 Million | $54.20 Million | ▲ +285.1% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | $1.20 Million | $40.40 Million | ▼ -89.9% |
| 1995 | 0.29x | $9.20 Million | $31.30 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $4.10 Million | $20.10 Million | — |