Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-11.89 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($343.60 Million) in one year. See CLMB FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Climb Global Solutions Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Climb Global Solutions across 32 annual periods. Also explore CLMB shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Climb Global Solutions (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Climb Global Solutions. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Climb Global Solutions worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $16.60 Million | $343.65 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $33.74 Million | $378.59 Million | ▼ -44.9% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $42.12 Million | $260.33 Million | ▲ +507.6% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $4.56 Million | $171.28 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $4.71 Million | $138.34 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 2020 | 0.31x | $37.97 Million | $120.82 Million | ▲ +683.7% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $3.25 Million | $81.03 Million | ▼ -80.6% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $13.90 Million | $67.40 Million | ▲ +753.3% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | $-2.02 Million | $64.01 Million | ▼ -365.5% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-516.00K | $76.09 Million | ▼ -104.6% |
| 2015 | 0.15x | $8.19 Million | $55.42 Million | ▲ +42.4% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $5.75 Million | $55.41 Million | ▼ -39.8% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $10.34 Million | $60.04 Million | ▲ +202.6% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | $3.38 Million | $59.32 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $3.70 Million | $45.93 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $2.92 Million | $42.00 Million | ▲ +103.7% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | $999.00K | $29.31 Million | ▲ +264.9% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-488.00K | $23.60 Million | ▼ -112.7% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $5.25 Million | $32.26 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $6.08 Million | $35.98 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $5.45 Million | $26.27 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 2004 | 0.12x | $1.93 Million | $16.42 Million | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $943.00K | $9.29 Million | ▲ +279.1% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $208.00K | $7.77 Million | ▲ +736.3% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $32.00K | $10.00 Million | ▼ -97.9% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $2.23 Million | $14.95 Million | ▲ +508.0% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $1.50 Million | $61.00 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $2.90 Million | $68.70 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $6.20 Million | $54.20 Million | ▲ +285.1% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | $1.20 Million | $40.40 Million | ▼ -89.9% |
| 1995 | 0.29x | $9.20 Million | $31.30 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $4.10 Million | $20.10 Million | — |