Cineverse Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cineverse Corp. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-994.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($95.09 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Cineverse Corp. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Cineverse Corp. (2003–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Cineverse Corp. from 2003 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Cineverse Corp. across 24 annual periods. Check CNVS cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Cineverse Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2003–2026)
Cineverse Corp. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2003 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cineverse Corp.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CNVS operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.30x | $-26.50 Million | $86.91 Million | ▼ -160.8% |
| 2025 | 0.50x | $17.41 Million | $34.72 Million | ▲ +252.5% |
| 2024 | -0.33x | $-10.59 Million | $32.23 Million | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2023 | -0.18x | $-8.97 Million | $49.01 Million | ▼ -339.0% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $4.88 Million | $63.69 Million | ▲ +122.8% |
| 2021 | -0.34x | $-20.01 Million | $59.56 Million | ▼ -661.4% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $7.76 Million | $129.73 Million | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $11.09 Million | $135.41 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | $22.40 Million | $143.49 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $31.70 Million | $222.04 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $25.50 Million | $282.43 Million | ▲ +186.4% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $9.21 Million | $292.15 Million | ▼ -72.4% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $39.59 Million | $347.02 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $29.37 Million | $298.77 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $39.94 Million | $301.61 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $30.07 Million | $305.70 Million | ▲ +182.7% |
| 2010 | 0.03x | $9.95 Million | $285.86 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | $33.82 Million | $283.61 Million | ▲ +8327.6% |
| 2008 | 0.00x | $-443.00K | $305.67 Million | ▲ +98.4% |
| 2007 | -0.09x | $-19.19 Million | $210.92 Million | ▲ +55.9% |
| 2006 | -0.21x | $-5.26 Million | $25.47 Million | ▼ -69.4% |
| 2005 | -0.12x | $-3.26 Million | $26.73 Million | ▼ -539.9% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $321.00K | $11.59 Million | ▲ +119.5% |
| 2003 | -0.14x | $-760.00K | $5.36 Million | — |