Cineverse Corp. Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Cineverse Corp. tangible net worth ratio. Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -4.6% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($41.92 Million) from net assets ($40.08 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check asset allocation strategy of Cineverse Corp. to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Cineverse Corp. (2003–2026)
Tangible net worth ratio of Cineverse Corp. from 2003 to 2026. This chart shows how Cineverse Corp.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 16 annual periods from 2003 to 2026. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at -4.6%, reflecting net assets of $40.08 Million with intangible assets of $41.92 Million USD. See Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) liquidity to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Cineverse Corp. Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2003–2026)
Cineverse Corp. tangible net worth ratio by year from 2003 to 2026. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Cineverse Corp. from 2003 to 2026, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Cineverse Corp. market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -1.7% | $43.37 Million | $44.11 Million | $130.28 Million | ▼ -53.6 pp |
| 2025 | 51.9% | $37.79 Million | $18.17 Million | $72.52 Million | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 2024 | 43.0% | $32.15 Million | $18.33 Million | $64.38 Million | ▼ -6.2 pp |
| 2023 | 49.2% | $39.07 Million | $19.87 Million | $88.08 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2022 | 51.1% | $40.95 Million | $20.03 Million | $104.64 Million | ▲ +13.2 pp |
| 2021 | 37.9% | $15.88 Million | $9.86 Million | $75.45 Million | ▲ +306.0 pp |
| 2014 | -268.0% | $10.23 Million | $37.64 Million | $357.25 Million | ▼ -329.0 pp |
| 2011 | 61.0% | $1.79 Million | $697.00K | $307.49 Million | ▲ +63.3 pp |
| 2010 | -2.3% | $11.29 Million | $11.55 Million | $297.15 Million | ▼ -65.3 pp |
| 2009 | 63.0% | $38.79 Million | $14.36 Million | $322.40 Million | ▼ -13.0 pp |
| 2008 | 75.9% | $68.01 Million | $16.37 Million | $373.68 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2007 | 75.5% | $90.81 Million | $22.27 Million | $301.73 Million | ▼ -21.0 pp |
| 2006 | 96.5% | $98.48 Million | $3.48 Million | $123.95 Million | ▲ +120.5 pp |
| 2005 | -24.0% | $11.05 Million | $13.70 Million | $37.78 Million | ▼ -24.1 pp |
| 2004 | 0.1% | $9.59 Million | $9.58 Million | $21.18 Million | ▼ -49.0 pp |
| 2003 | 49.1% | $4.54 Million | $2.31 Million | $9.89 Million | — |