Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Cineverse Corp. (CNVS) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 53.0% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($17.73 Million) from net assets ($37.74 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See net assets of Cineverse Corp. for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Cineverse Corp. Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2003–2025)
This chart shows how Cineverse Corp.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 15 annual periods from 2003 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 53.0%, reflecting net assets of $37.74 Million with intangible assets of $17.73 Million USD. Also explore Cineverse Corp. equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Cineverse Corp. (2003–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Cineverse Corp. from 2003 to 2025, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Cineverse Corp. market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 51.9% | $37.79 Million | $18.17 Million | $72.52 Million | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 2024 | 43.0% | $32.15 Million | $18.33 Million | $64.38 Million | ▼ -6.2 pp |
| 2023 | 49.2% | $39.07 Million | $19.87 Million | $88.08 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2022 | 51.1% | $40.95 Million | $20.03 Million | $104.64 Million | ▲ +13.2 pp |
| 2021 | 37.9% | $15.88 Million | $9.86 Million | $75.45 Million | ▲ +306.0 pp |
| 2014 | -268.0% | $10.23 Million | $37.64 Million | $357.25 Million | ▼ -329.0 pp |
| 2011 | 61.0% | $1.79 Million | $697.00K | $307.49 Million | ▲ +63.3 pp |
| 2010 | -2.3% | $11.29 Million | $11.55 Million | $297.15 Million | ▼ -65.3 pp |
| 2009 | 63.0% | $38.79 Million | $14.36 Million | $322.40 Million | ▼ -13.0 pp |
| 2008 | 75.9% | $68.01 Million | $16.37 Million | $373.68 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2007 | 75.5% | $90.81 Million | $22.27 Million | $301.73 Million | ▼ -21.0 pp |
| 2006 | 96.5% | $98.48 Million | $3.48 Million | $123.95 Million | ▲ +120.5 pp |
| 2005 | -24.0% | $11.05 Million | $13.70 Million | $37.78 Million | ▼ -24.1 pp |
| 2004 | 0.1% | $9.59 Million | $9.58 Million | $21.18 Million | ▼ -49.0 pp |
| 2003 | 49.1% | $4.54 Million | $2.31 Million | $9.89 Million | — |