Ceragon Networks Ltd (CRNT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ceragon Networks Ltd (CRNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $12.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($144.29 Million) in one year. See Ceragon Networks Ltd (CRNT) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Ceragon Networks Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Ceragon Networks Ltd across 27 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Ceragon Networks Ltd to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ceragon Networks Ltd (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ceragon Networks Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Ceragon Networks Ltd market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | $31.56 Million | $144.29 Million | ▲ +49.2% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $26.20 Million | $178.67 Million | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $30.89 Million | $164.51 Million | ▲ +750.3% |
| 2022 | -0.03x | $-4.89 Million | $169.53 Million | ▲ +70.1% |
| 2021 | -0.10x | $-15.02 Million | $155.41 Million | ▼ -170.8% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $17.25 Million | $126.29 Million | ▲ +236.7% |
| 2019 | -0.10x | $-12.93 Million | $129.47 Million | ▼ -159.1% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | $20.87 Million | $123.43 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $17.15 Million | $119.69 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $25.77 Million | $128.06 Million | ▲ +88.3% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $17.61 Million | $164.81 Million | ▲ +178.6% |
| 2014 | -0.14x | $-32.28 Million | $237.32 Million | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2013 | -0.13x | $-29.51 Million | $230.89 Million | ▼ -544.0% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $7.21 Million | $250.44 Million | ▲ +135.8% |
| 2011 | -0.08x | $-20.12 Million | $250.11 Million | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2010 | -0.13x | $-10.70 Million | $83.01 Million | ▼ -167.8% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $16.81 Million | $88.47 Million | ▲ +202.5% |
| 2008 | -0.19x | $-11.55 Million | $62.32 Million | ▼ -143.1% |
| 2007 | -0.08x | $-4.33 Million | $56.75 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2006 | -0.09x | $-4.35 Million | $48.79 Million | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2005 | -0.17x | $-4.31 Million | $24.80 Million | ▼ -113.6% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | $-1.70 Million | $20.92 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 2003 | -0.36x | $-4.89 Million | $13.74 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2002 | -0.80x | $-9.96 Million | $12.37 Million | ▲ +61.7% |
| 2001 | -2.10x | $-24.08 Million | $11.47 Million | ▼ -38.1% |
| 2000 | -1.52x | $-25.82 Million | $16.98 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 1999 | -1.49x | $-6.88 Million | $4.61 Million | — |