Charles & Colvard Ltd (CTHR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Charles & Colvard Ltd (CTHR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.09x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.31 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($15.33 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Charles & Colvard Ltd to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Charles & Colvard Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Charles & Colvard Ltd across 27 annual periods. Also explore Charles & Colvard Ltd (CTHR) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Charles & Colvard Ltd (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Charles & Colvard Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Charles & Colvard Ltd market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.48x | $-7.37 Million | $15.33 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2023 | -0.43x | $-3.88 Million | $9.11 Million | ▼ -817.0% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $572.55K | $9.65 Million | ▼ -91.5% |
| 2021 | 0.70x | $6.47 Million | $9.23 Million | ▲ +2001.4% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $249.19K | $7.47 Million | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $916.80K | $5.43 Million | ▲ +142.0% |
| 2018 | -0.40x | $-2.56 Million | $6.37 Million | ▼ -202.5% |
| 2017 | 0.39x | $2.21 Million | $5.64 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | $1.57 Million | $5.75 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2015 | 0.38x | $2.03 Million | $5.41 Million | ▲ +119.8% |
| 2014 | -1.90x | $-9.31 Million | $4.90 Million | ▼ -325.0% |
| 2013 | 0.85x | $2.78 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2012 | 1.33x | $3.45 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +88.5% |
| 2011 | 0.71x | $1.48 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2010 | 1.16x | $1.92 Million | $1.66 Million | ▲ +841.5% |
| 2009 | -0.16x | $-937.70K | $5.98 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2008 | -0.94x | $-4.94 Million | $5.24 Million | ▼ -254.7% |
| 2007 | -0.27x | $-1.79 Million | $6.73 Million | ▼ -119.1% |
| 2006 | 1.39x | $7.76 Million | $5.57 Million | ▲ +830.4% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $505.23K | $3.38 Million | ▲ +138.2% |
| 2004 | -0.39x | $-908.76K | $2.32 Million | ▼ -124.7% |
| 2003 | 1.58x | $3.48 Million | $2.20 Million | ▲ +323.3% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $435.19K | $1.16 Million | ▲ +110.7% |
| 2001 | -3.49x | $-9.59 Million | $2.75 Million | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2000 | -4.76x | $-15.70 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 1999 | -3.73x | $-8.20 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 1998 | -3.22x | $-2.90 Million | $900.00K | — |