Charles & Colvard Ltd (CTHR) — Net Asset Quality Index
Charles & Colvard Ltd (CTHR) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 62.6% as of March 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $40.98 Million minus total liabilities of $15.33 Million yields net assets of $25.65 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Charles & Colvard Ltd (CTHR) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Charles & Colvard Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2024)
This chart shows how Charles & Colvard Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1997 to 2024. As of March 2025, the index stands at 62.6%, representing net assets of $25.65 Million against total assets of $40.98 Million USD. Explore cash efficiency ratio of Charles & Colvard Ltd to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Charles & Colvard Ltd (1997–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Charles & Colvard Ltd from 1997 to 2024, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market cap of Charles & Colvard Ltd.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 62.6% | $25.65 Million | $40.98 Million | $15.33 Million | ▼ -18.8 pp |
| 2023 | 81.4% | $39.77 Million | $48.88 Million | $9.11 Million | ▼ -4.7 pp |
| 2022 | 86.1% | $59.56 Million | $69.21 Million | $9.65 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2021 | 85.8% | $55.69 Million | $64.92 Million | $9.23 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2020 | 84.7% | $41.44 Million | $48.90 Million | $7.47 Million | ▼ -4.7 pp |
| 2019 | 89.4% | $45.72 Million | $51.15 Million | $5.43 Million | ▲ +4.8 pp |
| 2018 | 84.5% | $34.86 Million | $41.23 Million | $6.37 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2017 | 86.1% | $34.87 Million | $40.51 Million | $5.64 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2016 | 87.0% | $38.39 Million | $44.14 Million | $5.75 Million | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2015 | 89.5% | $46.02 Million | $51.43 Million | $5.41 Million | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2014 | 92.1% | $57.43 Million | $62.32 Million | $4.90 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2013 | 94.5% | $56.68 Million | $59.97 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2012 | 95.2% | $51.05 Million | $53.65 Million | $2.60 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2011 | 95.9% | $48.81 Million | $50.91 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2010 | 96.7% | $48.88 Million | $50.53 Million | $1.66 Million | ▲ +7.0 pp |
| 2009 | 89.7% | $52.05 Million | $58.03 Million | $5.98 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2008 | 91.7% | $57.91 Million | $63.15 Million | $5.24 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2007 | 89.8% | $59.28 Million | $66.00 Million | $6.73 Million | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2006 | 91.2% | $57.97 Million | $63.54 Million | $5.57 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2005 | 93.3% | $47.26 Million | $50.64 Million | $3.38 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2004 | 95.0% | $44.12 Million | $46.45 Million | $2.32 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2003 | 95.2% | $43.75 Million | $45.95 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2002 | 96.7% | $34.08 Million | $35.24 Million | $1.16 Million | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 2001 | 90.7% | $26.86 Million | $29.61 Million | $2.75 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2000 | 91.0% | $33.50 Million | $36.80 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 1999 | 94.5% | $38.00 Million | $40.20 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 1998 | 98.0% | $44.00 Million | $44.90 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -102.0 pp |
| 1997 | 200.0% | $2.40 Million | $1.20 Million | $-1.20 Million | — |