Dyadic International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Dyadic International Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Dyadic International Inc (DYAI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.20x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.85 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.07 Million) in one year. Check DYAI cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Dyadic International Inc (2003–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Dyadic International Inc from 2003 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Dyadic International Inc across 22 annual periods. Check Dyadic International Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Dyadic International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2003–2024)
Dyadic International Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2003 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dyadic International Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Dyadic International Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.53x | $-3.97 Million | $7.46 Million | ▲ +81.5% |
| 2023 | -2.87x | $-6.73 Million | $2.34 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2022 | -3.08x | $-8.08 Million | $2.63 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2021 | -3.88x | $-11.28 Million | $2.91 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2020 | -4.04x | $-6.57 Million | $1.63 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2019 | -3.64x | $-5.78 Million | $1.59 Million | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2018 | -5.19x | $-4.41 Million | $849.64K | ▼ -53.0% |
| 2017 | -3.39x | $-2.61 Million | $768.89K | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2016 | -5.97x | $-6.04 Million | $1.01 Million | ▼ -2038.3% |
| 2015 | -0.28x | $-802.67K | $2.87 Million | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2014 | -0.57x | $-6.20 Million | $10.80 Million | ▼ -239.4% |
| 2013 | 0.41x | $5.10 Million | $12.37 Million | ▲ +1151.3% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $365.17K | $11.09 Million | ▲ +110.1% |
| 2011 | -0.33x | $-3.63 Million | $11.10 Million | ▲ +66.7% |
| 2010 | -0.98x | $-7.64 Million | $7.79 Million | ▼ -210.8% |
| 2009 | 0.89x | $6.55 Million | $7.40 Million | ▲ +161.7% |
| 2008 | -1.43x | $-12.87 Million | $8.97 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2007 | -1.20x | $-15.11 Million | $12.59 Million | ▼ -2673.1% |
| 2006 | 0.05x | $790.51K | $16.95 Million | ▲ +105.0% |
| 2005 | -0.93x | $-7.82 Million | $8.38 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2004 | -0.73x | $-5.92 Million | $8.15 Million | ▲ +48.9% |
| 2003 | -1.42x | $-128.49K | $90.57K | — |