Dyadic International Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Dyadic International Inc working capital to net assets ratio. Dyadic International Inc (DYAI) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 287.4% as of September 2025. Working capital of $7.49 Million (current assets of $11.55 Million minus current liabilities of $4.05 Million) is measured against net assets of $2.61 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check Dyadic International Inc tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Dyadic International Inc (2003–2024)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Dyadic International Inc from 2003 to 2024. This chart shows how Dyadic International Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 22 annual periods from 2003 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 287.4%, reflecting working capital of $7.49 Million against net assets of $2.61 Million USD. See Dyadic International Inc defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Dyadic International Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2003–2024)
Dyadic International Inc working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2003 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Dyadic International Inc from 2003 to 2024, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Dyadic International Inc total assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 298.7% | $7.38 Million | $2.47 Million | $9.83 Million | $2.45 Million | ▲ +199.8 pp |
| 2023 | 98.9% | $5.82 Million | $5.88 Million | $8.07 Million | $2.25 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 99.0% | $10.97 Million | $11.09 Million | $13.42 Million | $2.45 Million | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2021 | 100.3% | $18.45 Million | $18.39 Million | $21.01 Million | $2.56 Million | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2020 | 99.0% | $28.16 Million | $28.45 Million | $29.78 Million | $1.63 Million | ▲ +4.0 pp |
| 2019 | 94.9% | $34.05 Million | $35.86 Million | $35.64 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2018 | 98.7% | $41.90 Million | $42.45 Million | $42.75 Million | $849.64K | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2017 | 97.7% | $48.85 Million | $49.98 Million | $49.62 Million | $768.89K | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2016 | 98.1% | $56.62 Million | $57.69 Million | $57.63 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +8.3 pp |
| 2015 | 89.8% | $66.30 Million | $73.79 Million | $69.17 Million | $2.87 Million | ▲ +305.2 pp |
| 2014 | -215.3% | $4.88 Million | $-2.26 Million | $7.54 Million | $2.66 Million | ▼ -593.9 pp |
| 2013 | 378.6% | $9.72 Million | $2.57 Million | $13.85 Million | $4.13 Million | ▼ -60.8 pp |
| 2012 | 439.4% | $7.85 Million | $1.79 Million | $11.95 Million | $4.09 Million | ▲ +1081.9 pp |
| 2011 | -642.5% | $5.14 Million | $-800.00K | $9.24 Million | $4.10 Million | ▼ -863.4 pp |
| 2010 | 220.9% | $5.39 Million | $2.44 Million | $9.18 Million | $3.79 Million | ▲ +135.4 pp |
| 2009 | 85.5% | $5.95 Million | $6.96 Million | $13.35 Million | $7.40 Million | ▲ +77.3 pp |
| 2008 | 8.2% | $120.00K | $1.46 Million | $9.09 Million | $8.97 Million | ▼ -105.6 pp |
| 2007 | 113.9% | $15.37 Million | $13.50 Million | $24.63 Million | $9.26 Million | ▼ -16.2 pp |
| 2006 | 130.1% | $36.66 Million | $28.19 Million | $41.07 Million | $4.41 Million | ▲ +21.9 pp |
| 2005 | 108.2% | $16.63 Million | $15.38 Million | $21.27 Million | $4.64 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2004 | 106.6% | $26.20 Million | $24.57 Million | $31.06 Million | $4.86 Million | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $-74.09K | $-74.09K | $16.48K | $90.57K | — |