Enstar Group Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enstar Group Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. Enstar Group Limited (ESGR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $143.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.13 Billion) in one year. Check Enstar Group Limited (ESGR) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Enstar Group Limited (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Enstar Group Limited from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Enstar Group Limited across 29 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Enstar Group Limited reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Enstar Group Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Enstar Group Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enstar Group Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ESGR cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.03x | $483.00 Million | $14.31 Billion | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $523.00 Million | $15.27 Billion | ▲ +129.2% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $257.00 Million | $17.19 Billion | ▼ -92.9% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $3.80 Billion | $17.92 Billion | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $2.79 Billion | $14.59 Billion | ▲ +52.3% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $1.76 Billion | $14.07 Billion | ▲ +1054.1% |
| 2018 | -0.01x | $-160.07 Million | $12.18 Billion | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | $-343.11 Million | $9.98 Billion | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | $-202.69 Million | $9.60 Billion | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | $-739.36 Million | $8.89 Billion | ▼ -217.6% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $497.62 Million | $7.04 Billion | ▲ +841.2% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-62.39 Million | $6.54 Billion | ▲ +79.1% |
| 2012 | -0.05x | $-187.35 Million | $4.11 Billion | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2011 | -0.18x | $-909.92 Million | $4.92 Billion | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2010 | -0.15x | $-609.21 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▼ -136.8% |
| 2009 | -0.06x | $-198.06 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -242.0% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $157.19 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $73.67 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▲ +1201.1% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $4.17 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2005 | -0.10x | $-2.01 Million | $20.10 Million | ▼ -114.9% |
| 2004 | 0.67x | $8.62 Million | $12.80 Million | ▼ -69.9% |
| 2003 | 2.24x | $14.58 Million | $6.52 Million | ▲ +508.2% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $3.08 Million | $8.36 Million | ▼ -89.1% |
| 2001 | 3.38x | $6.64 Million | $1.96 Million | ▲ +228.4% |
| 2000 | 1.03x | $1.97 Million | $1.92 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 1999 | 2.05x | $1.68 Million | $819.00K | ▲ +217.3% |
| 1998 | 0.64x | $692.00K | $1.07 Million | ▲ +204.3% |
| 1997 | -0.62x | $-2.02 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 1996 | -0.93x | $-19.86 Million | $21.43 Million | — |