Enstar Group Limited (ESGR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enstar Group Limited (ESGR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $143.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.13 Billion) in one year. Explore how much of Enstar Group Limited's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Enstar Group Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Enstar Group Limited across 29 annual periods. Also explore how large is Enstar Group Limited's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enstar Group Limited (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enstar Group Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Enstar Group Limited.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.03x | $483.00 Million | $14.31 Billion | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $523.00 Million | $15.27 Billion | ▲ +129.2% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $257.00 Million | $17.19 Billion | ▼ -92.9% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $3.80 Billion | $17.92 Billion | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $2.79 Billion | $14.59 Billion | ▲ +52.3% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $1.76 Billion | $14.07 Billion | ▲ +1054.1% |
| 2018 | -0.01x | $-160.07 Million | $12.18 Billion | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | $-343.11 Million | $9.98 Billion | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | $-202.69 Million | $9.60 Billion | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | $-739.36 Million | $8.89 Billion | ▼ -217.6% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $497.62 Million | $7.04 Billion | ▲ +841.2% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-62.39 Million | $6.54 Billion | ▲ +79.1% |
| 2012 | -0.05x | $-187.35 Million | $4.11 Billion | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2011 | -0.18x | $-909.92 Million | $4.92 Billion | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2010 | -0.15x | $-609.21 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▼ -136.8% |
| 2009 | -0.06x | $-198.06 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -242.0% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $157.19 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $73.67 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▲ +1201.1% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $4.17 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2005 | -0.10x | $-2.01 Million | $20.10 Million | ▼ -114.9% |
| 2004 | 0.67x | $8.62 Million | $12.80 Million | ▼ -69.9% |
| 2003 | 2.24x | $14.58 Million | $6.52 Million | ▲ +508.2% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $3.08 Million | $8.36 Million | ▼ -89.1% |
| 2001 | 3.38x | $6.64 Million | $1.96 Million | ▲ +228.4% |
| 2000 | 1.03x | $1.97 Million | $1.92 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 1999 | 2.05x | $1.68 Million | $819.00K | ▲ +217.3% |
| 1998 | 0.64x | $692.00K | $1.07 Million | ▲ +204.3% |
| 1997 | -0.62x | $-2.02 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 1996 | -0.93x | $-19.86 Million | $21.43 Million | — |