Enstar Group Limited (ESGR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Enstar Group Limited (ESGR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $143.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.13 Billion) in one year. See Enstar Group Limited free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Enstar Group Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Enstar Group Limited across 29 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Enstar Group Limited to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Enstar Group Limited (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Enstar Group Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ESGR stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.03x | $483.00 Million | $14.31 Billion | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $523.00 Million | $15.27 Billion | ▲ +129.2% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $257.00 Million | $17.19 Billion | ▼ -92.9% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $3.80 Billion | $17.92 Billion | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $2.79 Billion | $14.59 Billion | ▲ +52.3% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $1.76 Billion | $14.07 Billion | ▲ +1054.1% |
| 2018 | -0.01x | $-160.07 Million | $12.18 Billion | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | $-343.11 Million | $9.98 Billion | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | $-202.69 Million | $9.60 Billion | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | $-739.36 Million | $8.89 Billion | ▼ -217.6% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $497.62 Million | $7.04 Billion | ▲ +841.2% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-62.39 Million | $6.54 Billion | ▲ +79.1% |
| 2012 | -0.05x | $-187.35 Million | $4.11 Billion | ▲ +75.3% |
| 2011 | -0.18x | $-909.92 Million | $4.92 Billion | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2010 | -0.15x | $-609.21 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▼ -136.8% |
| 2009 | -0.06x | $-198.06 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -242.0% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $157.19 Million | $3.49 Billion | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $73.67 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▲ +1201.1% |
| 2006 | 0.00x | $4.17 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2005 | -0.10x | $-2.01 Million | $20.10 Million | ▼ -114.9% |
| 2004 | 0.67x | $8.62 Million | $12.80 Million | ▼ -69.9% |
| 2003 | 2.24x | $14.58 Million | $6.52 Million | ▲ +508.2% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $3.08 Million | $8.36 Million | ▼ -89.1% |
| 2001 | 3.38x | $6.64 Million | $1.96 Million | ▲ +228.4% |
| 2000 | 1.03x | $1.97 Million | $1.92 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 1999 | 2.05x | $1.68 Million | $819.00K | ▲ +217.3% |
| 1998 | 0.64x | $692.00K | $1.07 Million | ▲ +204.3% |
| 1997 | -0.62x | $-2.02 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 1996 | -0.93x | $-19.86 Million | $21.43 Million | — |