Enstar Group Limited (ESGR) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Enstar Group Limited (ESGR) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of March 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($6.21 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See ESGR working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Enstar Group Limited Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1996–2024)
This chart shows how Enstar Group Limited's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 29 annual periods from 1996 to 2024. As of March 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $6.21 Billion with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. See Enstar Group Limited (ESGR) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Enstar Group Limited (1996–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Enstar Group Limited from 1996 to 2024, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Enstar Group Limited market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 100.0% | $6.10 Billion | $0.00 | $20.41 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $5.65 Billion | $0.00 | $20.91 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | $4.96 Billion | $0.00 | $22.15 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | $6.50 Billion | $0.00 | $24.43 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | $7.05 Billion | $0.00 | $21.65 Billion | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2019 | 98.1% | $5.30 Billion | $101.66 Million | $19.36 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2018 | 97.6% | $4.37 Billion | $103.92 Million | $16.56 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2017 | 97.0% | $3.63 Billion | $107.52 Million | $13.61 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2016 | 96.6% | $3.27 Billion | $111.78 Million | $12.87 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2015 | 96.0% | $2.94 Billion | $118.23 Million | $11.83 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2014 | 95.6% | $2.90 Billion | $128.08 Million | $9.94 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2013 | 95.7% | $2.08 Billion | $90.00 Million | $8.62 Billion | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2012 | 98.8% | $1.78 Billion | $21.22 Million | $5.88 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2011 | 98.7% | $1.68 Billion | $21.22 Million | $6.61 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2010 | 98.3% | $1.22 Billion | $21.22 Million | $5.24 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2009 | 98.0% | $1.08 Billion | $21.22 Million | $4.17 Billion | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2008 | 97.6% | $871.23 Million | $21.22 Million | $4.36 Billion | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2007 | 95.9% | $514.04 Million | $21.22 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2006 | 94.3% | $374.13 Million | $21.22 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▲ +7.2 pp |
| 2005 | 87.1% | $165.12 Million | $21.22 Million | $185.22 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2004 | 85.5% | $146.17 Million | $21.22 Million | $158.98 Million | ▼ -14.5 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $145.93 Million | $0.00 | $152.45 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $120.25 Million | $0.00 | $128.61 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $97.66 Million | $0.00 | $99.62 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $91.40 Million | $0.00 | $93.32 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $68.59 Million | $0.00 | $69.41 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $66.94 Million | $0.00 | $68.02 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $69.66 Million | $0.00 | $72.93 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $48.14 Million | $0.00 | $69.57 Million | — |