1-800 FLOWERS.COM Inc (FLWS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
1-800 FLOWERS.COM Inc (FLWS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.26x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-128.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($487.41 Million) in one year. See 1-800 FLOWERS.COM Inc (FLWS) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
1-800 FLOWERS.COM Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for 1-800 FLOWERS.COM Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore 1-800 FLOWERS.COM Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for 1-800 FLOWERS.COM Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for 1-800 FLOWERS.COM Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see FLWS market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.05x | $-26.36 Million | $550.04 Million | ▼ -131.2% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $95.00 Million | $617.44 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | $115.35 Million | $636.29 Million | ▲ +2144.1% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $5.19 Million | $642.32 Million | ▼ -97.4% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | $173.29 Million | $567.61 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | $139.42 Million | $402.38 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | $78.10 Million | $263.73 Million | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $58.34 Million | $255.99 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | $61.01 Million | $270.23 Million | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $57.67 Million | $263.93 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2015 | 0.43x | $125.73 Million | $291.69 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2014 | 0.52x | $42.54 Million | $81.45 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2013 | 0.43x | $34.65 Million | $80.80 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | $40.17 Million | $103.10 Million | ▲ +46.0% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $30.76 Million | $115.29 Million | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2010 | 0.32x | $39.66 Million | $123.46 Million | ▲ +73.6% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $28.19 Million | $152.34 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2008 | 0.41x | $57.90 Million | $139.87 Million | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2007 | 0.21x | $32.34 Million | $151.48 Million | ▲ +122.3% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $14.74 Million | $153.45 Million | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $10.43 Million | $65.62 Million | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2004 | 0.56x | $42.13 Million | $75.16 Million | ▲ +122.6% |
| 2003 | 0.25x | $19.52 Million | $77.51 Million | ▲ +80.6% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $11.61 Million | $83.25 Million | ▲ +185.5% |
| 2001 | -0.16x | $-12.63 Million | $77.44 Million | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2000 | -0.52x | $-34.41 Million | $65.72 Million | ▼ -625.1% |
| 1999 | -0.07x | $-5.30 Million | $73.40 Million | ▼ -148.1% |
| 1998 | 0.15x | $9.50 Million | $63.30 Million | — |