Great Elm Group Inc (GEG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Great Elm Group Inc (GEG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.83 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($71.94 Million) in one year. Explore Great Elm Group Inc (GEG) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Great Elm Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Great Elm Group Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore Great Elm Group Inc balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Great Elm Group Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Great Elm Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Great Elm Group Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.12x | $-9.01 Million | $73.27 Million | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2024 | -0.22x | $-15.55 Million | $70.25 Million | ▼ -572.3% |
| 2023 | -0.03x | $-2.37 Million | $72.05 Million | ▼ -114.2% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $29.28 Million | $125.83 Million | ▲ +230.5% |
| 2021 | -0.18x | $-18.98 Million | $106.44 Million | ▼ -276.0% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $13.24 Million | $130.76 Million | ▲ +342.8% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $2.69 Million | $117.64 Million | ▲ +141.0% |
| 2018 | -0.06x | $-3.85 Million | $69.00 Million | ▲ +94.4% |
| 2017 | -1.00x | $-10.49 Million | $10.48 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2016 | -0.77x | $-34.58 Million | $44.93 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2015 | -0.92x | $-59.97 Million | $65.38 Million | ▼ -207.9% |
| 2014 | 0.85x | $74.28 Million | $87.37 Million | ▲ +141.7% |
| 2013 | -2.04x | $-69.94 Million | $34.31 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2012 | -1.51x | $-43.63 Million | $28.86 Million | ▼ -553.4% |
| 2011 | -0.23x | $-21.48 Million | $92.87 Million | ▼ -190.5% |
| 2010 | -0.08x | $-9.22 Million | $115.85 Million | ▼ -72114.3% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | $15.00K | $135.67 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2008 | -0.15x | $-54.03 Million | $350.73 Million | ▼ -1940.7% |
| 2007 | -0.01x | $-2.85 Million | $378.04 Million | ▼ -114.9% |
| 2006 | 0.05x | $19.28 Million | $380.24 Million | ▲ +361.6% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-7.62 Million | $392.89 Million | ▲ +87.7% |
| 2004 | -0.16x | $-47.80 Million | $303.48 Million | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2003 | -0.31x | $-58.05 Million | $184.39 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2002 | -0.24x | $-32.03 Million | $136.30 Million | ▲ +49.0% |
| 2001 | -0.46x | $-77.31 Million | $167.76 Million | ▼ -4435.1% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | $-1.40 Million | $138.08 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-900.00K | $46.60 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 1998 | -0.48x | $-5.10 Million | $10.70 Million | — |