Great Elm Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Great Elm Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Great Elm Group Inc (GEG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($72.88 Million) in one year. Check Great Elm Group Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Great Elm Group Inc (1998–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Great Elm Group Inc from 1998 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Great Elm Group Inc across 29 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Great Elm Group Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Great Elm Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2026)
Great Elm Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Great Elm Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GEG cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.16x | $11.88 Million | $72.88 Million | ▲ +232.6% |
| 2025 | -0.12x | $-9.01 Million | $73.27 Million | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2024 | -0.22x | $-15.55 Million | $70.25 Million | ▼ -572.3% |
| 2023 | -0.03x | $-2.37 Million | $72.05 Million | ▼ -114.2% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $29.28 Million | $125.83 Million | ▲ +230.5% |
| 2021 | -0.18x | $-18.98 Million | $106.44 Million | ▼ -276.0% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $13.24 Million | $130.76 Million | ▲ +342.8% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $2.69 Million | $117.64 Million | ▲ +141.0% |
| 2018 | -0.06x | $-3.85 Million | $69.00 Million | ▲ +94.4% |
| 2017 | -1.00x | $-10.49 Million | $10.48 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2016 | -0.77x | $-34.58 Million | $44.93 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2015 | -0.92x | $-59.97 Million | $65.38 Million | ▼ -207.9% |
| 2014 | 0.85x | $74.28 Million | $87.37 Million | ▲ +141.7% |
| 2013 | -2.04x | $-69.94 Million | $34.31 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2012 | -1.51x | $-43.63 Million | $28.86 Million | ▼ -553.4% |
| 2011 | -0.23x | $-21.48 Million | $92.87 Million | ▼ -190.5% |
| 2010 | -0.08x | $-9.22 Million | $115.85 Million | ▼ -72114.3% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | $15.00K | $135.67 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2008 | -0.15x | $-54.03 Million | $350.73 Million | ▼ -1940.7% |
| 2007 | -0.01x | $-2.85 Million | $378.04 Million | ▼ -114.9% |
| 2006 | 0.05x | $19.28 Million | $380.24 Million | ▲ +361.6% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-7.62 Million | $392.89 Million | ▲ +87.7% |
| 2004 | -0.16x | $-47.80 Million | $303.48 Million | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2003 | -0.31x | $-58.05 Million | $184.39 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2002 | -0.24x | $-32.03 Million | $136.30 Million | ▲ +49.0% |
| 2001 | -0.46x | $-77.31 Million | $167.76 Million | ▼ -4435.1% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | $-1.40 Million | $138.08 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-900.00K | $46.60 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 1998 | -0.48x | $-5.10 Million | $10.70 Million | — |