Great Elm Group Inc (GEG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Great Elm Group Inc (GEG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.83 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($71.94 Million) in one year. See GEG free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Great Elm Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Great Elm Group Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Great Elm Group Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Great Elm Group Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Great Elm Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Great Elm Group Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.12x | $-9.01 Million | $73.27 Million | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2024 | -0.22x | $-15.55 Million | $70.25 Million | ▼ -572.3% |
| 2023 | -0.03x | $-2.37 Million | $72.05 Million | ▼ -114.2% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $29.28 Million | $125.83 Million | ▲ +230.5% |
| 2021 | -0.18x | $-18.98 Million | $106.44 Million | ▼ -276.0% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $13.24 Million | $130.76 Million | ▲ +342.8% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $2.69 Million | $117.64 Million | ▲ +141.0% |
| 2018 | -0.06x | $-3.85 Million | $69.00 Million | ▲ +94.4% |
| 2017 | -1.00x | $-10.49 Million | $10.48 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2016 | -0.77x | $-34.58 Million | $44.93 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2015 | -0.92x | $-59.97 Million | $65.38 Million | ▼ -207.9% |
| 2014 | 0.85x | $74.28 Million | $87.37 Million | ▲ +141.7% |
| 2013 | -2.04x | $-69.94 Million | $34.31 Million | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2012 | -1.51x | $-43.63 Million | $28.86 Million | ▼ -553.4% |
| 2011 | -0.23x | $-21.48 Million | $92.87 Million | ▼ -190.5% |
| 2010 | -0.08x | $-9.22 Million | $115.85 Million | ▼ -72114.3% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | $15.00K | $135.67 Million | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2008 | -0.15x | $-54.03 Million | $350.73 Million | ▼ -1940.7% |
| 2007 | -0.01x | $-2.85 Million | $378.04 Million | ▼ -114.9% |
| 2006 | 0.05x | $19.28 Million | $380.24 Million | ▲ +361.6% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-7.62 Million | $392.89 Million | ▲ +87.7% |
| 2004 | -0.16x | $-47.80 Million | $303.48 Million | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2003 | -0.31x | $-58.05 Million | $184.39 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2002 | -0.24x | $-32.03 Million | $136.30 Million | ▲ +49.0% |
| 2001 | -0.46x | $-77.31 Million | $167.76 Million | ▼ -4435.1% |
| 2000 | -0.01x | $-1.40 Million | $138.08 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-900.00K | $46.60 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 1998 | -0.48x | $-5.10 Million | $10.70 Million | — |