Great Elm Group Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Great Elm Group Inc tangible net worth ratio. Great Elm Group Inc (GEG) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 73.3% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($10.88 Million) from net assets ($40.81 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check Great Elm Group Inc (GEG) strategic asset index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Great Elm Group Inc (1998–2026)
Tangible net worth ratio of Great Elm Group Inc from 1998 to 2026. This chart shows how Great Elm Group Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 29 annual periods from 1998 to 2026. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 73.3%, reflecting net assets of $40.81 Million with intangible assets of $10.88 Million USD. See GEG working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Great Elm Group Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1998–2026)
Great Elm Group Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 1998 to 2026. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Great Elm Group Inc from 1998 to 2026, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see GEG company net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 73.3% | $40.81 Million | $10.88 Million | $113.68 Million | ▼ -11.8 pp |
| 2025 | 85.1% | $80.67 Million | $12.01 Million | $153.94 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2024 | 84.3% | $70.19 Million | $11.04 Million | $140.45 Million | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2023 | 81.0% | $63.84 Million | $12.12 Million | $135.89 Million | ▲ +12.4 pp |
| 2022 | 68.6% | $42.25 Million | $13.25 Million | $168.09 Million | ▼ -15.2 pp |
| 2021 | 83.9% | $55.42 Million | $8.93 Million | $161.87 Million | ▲ +7.3 pp |
| 2020 | 76.6% | $64.68 Million | $15.13 Million | $195.44 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2019 | 73.0% | $65.08 Million | $17.58 Million | $182.73 Million | ▼ -12.5 pp |
| 2018 | 85.4% | $64.59 Million | $9.40 Million | $133.59 Million | ▼ -8.4 pp |
| 2017 | 93.8% | $66.22 Million | $4.10 Million | $76.69 Million | ▼ -6.2 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | $36.82 Million | $0.00 | $81.75 Million | ▲ +6.8 pp |
| 2015 | 93.2% | $23.50 Million | $1.59 Million | $88.88 Million | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 2014 | 96.7% | $63.07 Million | $2.06 Million | $150.44 Million | ▼ -3.3 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | $43.92 Million | $0.00 | $78.24 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | $68.63 Million | $0.00 | $97.49 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2011 | 99.0% | $54.95 Million | $553.00K | $147.82 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2010 | 97.0% | $72.76 Million | $2.20 Million | $188.61 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2009 | 94.7% | $72.70 Million | $3.88 Million | $208.37 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2008 | 95.3% | $154.01 Million | $7.24 Million | $504.74 Million | ▲ +7.4 pp |
| 2007 | 87.9% | $170.25 Million | $20.60 Million | $548.29 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2006 | 89.6% | $538.35 Million | $55.73 Million | $918.59 Million | ▲ +37.6 pp |
| 2005 | 52.0% | $156.40 Million | $75.05 Million | $549.29 Million | ▼ -46.3 pp |
| 2004 | 98.3% | $173.03 Million | $2.95 Million | $476.51 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2003 | 96.6% | $182.28 Million | $6.28 Million | $366.67 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2002 | 95.6% | $392.90 Million | $17.37 Million | $529.20 Million | ▲ +63.4 pp |
| 2001 | 32.2% | $1.56 Billion | $1.06 Billion | $1.73 Billion | ▲ +12.0 pp |
| 2000 | 20.2% | $2.02 Billion | $1.61 Billion | $2.16 Billion | ▼ -79.8 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $92.30 Million | $0.00 | $138.90 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $28.40 Million | $0.00 | $39.10 Million | — |