G-III Apparel Group Ltd (GIII) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
G-III Apparel Group Ltd (GIII) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.27x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $227.59 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($850.50 Million) in one year. See G-III Apparel Group Ltd free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
G-III Apparel Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for G-III Apparel Group Ltd across 36 annual periods. Also explore G-III Apparel Group Ltd annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for G-III Apparel Group Ltd (1990–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for G-III Apparel Group Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see G-III Apparel Group Ltd market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.35x | $299.14 Million | $850.50 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2025 | 0.39x | $316.40 Million | $803.75 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2024 | 0.52x | $587.58 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▲ +757.8% |
| 2023 | -0.08x | $-104.60 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▼ -151.9% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $185.80 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +393.2% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $74.76 Million | $2.43 Billion | ▼ -81.2% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $209.02 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $103.83 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $79.73 Million | $794.44 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $105.69 Million | $835.14 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $64.17 Million | $295.94 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $81.60 Million | $285.46 Million | ▲ +4.4% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | $84.59 Million | $308.90 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $54.49 Million | $288.53 Million | ▲ +447.1% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $6.78 Million | $196.30 Million | ▲ +118.4% |
| 2011 | -0.19x | $-28.65 Million | $152.91 Million | ▼ -142.5% |
| 2010 | 0.44x | $44.00 Million | $99.81 Million | ▲ +132.4% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $22.52 Million | $118.73 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $10.62 Million | $63.82 Million | ▲ +777.6% |
| 2007 | -0.02x | $-1.42 Million | $57.89 Million | ▼ -138.9% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $3.56 Million | $56.31 Million | ▲ +121.5% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $390.00K | $13.66 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2004 | 0.83x | $12.85 Million | $15.42 Million | ▲ +567.4% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $1.90 Million | $15.21 Million | ▲ +143.0% |
| 2002 | -0.29x | $-3.77 Million | $12.98 Million | ▼ -359.2% |
| 2001 | 0.11x | $2.23 Million | $19.88 Million | ▼ -69.7% |
| 2000 | 0.37x | $6.87 Million | $18.57 Million | ▲ +49.6% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $2.30 Million | $9.30 Million | ▲ +152.9% |
| 1998 | -0.47x | $-5.00 Million | $10.70 Million | ▼ -192.7% |
| 1997 | 0.50x | $5.90 Million | $11.70 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 1996 | 1.52x | $17.60 Million | $11.60 Million | ▲ +4030.3% |
| 1995 | 0.04x | $900.00K | $24.50 Million | ▼ -76.0% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $3.90 Million | $25.50 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 1993 | 2.05x | $34.80 Million | $17.00 Million | ▲ +232.3% |
| 1992 | -1.55x | $-26.30 Million | $17.00 Million | ▼ -130.7% |
| 1990 | -0.67x | $-22.00 Million | $32.80 Million | — |