Gilead Sciences Inc (GILD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gilead Sciences Inc (GILD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.33 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($36.41 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does Gilead Sciences Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gilead Sciences Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gilead Sciences Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore Gilead Sciences Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gilead Sciences Inc (1990–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gilead Sciences Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GILD market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.27x | $10.83 Billion | $39.75 Billion | ▲ +34.0% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $8.01 Billion | $39.38 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $9.07 Billion | $41.96 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $11.38 Billion | $46.89 Billion | ▲ +49.2% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $8.17 Billion | $50.19 Billion | ▼ -30.6% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $9.14 Billion | $38.98 Billion | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $8.40 Billion | $42.14 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $11.90 Billion | $49.78 Billion | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $17.05 Billion | $37.61 Billion | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2015 | 0.65x | $21.25 Billion | $32.73 Billion | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2014 | 0.68x | $12.82 Billion | $18.84 Billion | ▲ +137.3% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $3.10 Billion | $10.83 Billion | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2012 | 0.27x | $3.19 Billion | $11.70 Billion | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2011 | 0.35x | $3.64 Billion | $10.44 Billion | ▼ -32.7% |
| 2010 | 0.52x | $2.83 Billion | $5.47 Billion | ▼ -46.3% |
| 2009 | 0.96x | $3.08 Billion | $3.19 Billion | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2008 | 0.87x | $2.14 Billion | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2007 | 0.79x | $1.77 Billion | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2006 | 0.55x | $1.22 Billion | $2.22 Billion | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2005 | 0.96x | $705.64 Million | $738.54 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 2004 | 1.78x | $507.96 Million | $285.09 Million | ▲ +319.0% |
| 2003 | 0.43x | $234.61 Million | $551.75 Million | ▲ +309.6% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $74.41 Million | $716.84 Million | ▲ +128.0% |
| 2001 | -0.37x | $-126.98 Million | $342.35 Million | ▼ -217.5% |
| 2000 | -0.12x | $-38.20 Million | $326.98 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 1999 | -0.45x | $-62.60 Million | $139.52 Million | ▼ -34.8% |
| 1998 | -0.33x | $-51.30 Million | $154.10 Million | ▲ +78.7% |
| 1997 | -1.57x | $-54.50 Million | $34.80 Million | ▼ -80.3% |
| 1996 | -0.87x | $-16.50 Million | $19.00 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 1995 | -1.51x | $-23.00 Million | $15.20 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 1994 | -1.68x | $-27.40 Million | $16.30 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 1993 | -1.98x | $-22.40 Million | $11.30 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 1992 | -1.20x | $-8.90 Million | $7.40 Million | ▼ -0.8% |
| 1991 | -1.19x | $-3.70 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 1990 | -1.04x | $-2.40 Million | $2.30 Million | — |