Gilead Sciences Inc (GILD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gilead Sciences Inc (GILD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.33 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($36.41 Billion) in one year. Explore Gilead Sciences Inc (GILD) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gilead Sciences Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gilead Sciences Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore GILD total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gilead Sciences Inc (1990–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gilead Sciences Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Gilead Sciences Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.27x | $10.83 Billion | $39.75 Billion | ▲ +34.0% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $8.01 Billion | $39.38 Billion | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $9.07 Billion | $41.96 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $11.38 Billion | $46.89 Billion | ▲ +49.2% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $8.17 Billion | $50.19 Billion | ▼ -30.6% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $9.14 Billion | $38.98 Billion | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $8.40 Billion | $42.14 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $11.90 Billion | $49.78 Billion | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2016 | 0.45x | $17.05 Billion | $37.61 Billion | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2015 | 0.65x | $21.25 Billion | $32.73 Billion | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2014 | 0.68x | $12.82 Billion | $18.84 Billion | ▲ +137.3% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $3.10 Billion | $10.83 Billion | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2012 | 0.27x | $3.19 Billion | $11.70 Billion | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2011 | 0.35x | $3.64 Billion | $10.44 Billion | ▼ -32.7% |
| 2010 | 0.52x | $2.83 Billion | $5.47 Billion | ▼ -46.3% |
| 2009 | 0.96x | $3.08 Billion | $3.19 Billion | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2008 | 0.87x | $2.14 Billion | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2007 | 0.79x | $1.77 Billion | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2006 | 0.55x | $1.22 Billion | $2.22 Billion | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2005 | 0.96x | $705.64 Million | $738.54 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 2004 | 1.78x | $507.96 Million | $285.09 Million | ▲ +319.0% |
| 2003 | 0.43x | $234.61 Million | $551.75 Million | ▲ +309.6% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $74.41 Million | $716.84 Million | ▲ +128.0% |
| 2001 | -0.37x | $-126.98 Million | $342.35 Million | ▼ -217.5% |
| 2000 | -0.12x | $-38.20 Million | $326.98 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 1999 | -0.45x | $-62.60 Million | $139.52 Million | ▼ -34.8% |
| 1998 | -0.33x | $-51.30 Million | $154.10 Million | ▲ +78.7% |
| 1997 | -1.57x | $-54.50 Million | $34.80 Million | ▼ -80.3% |
| 1996 | -0.87x | $-16.50 Million | $19.00 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 1995 | -1.51x | $-23.00 Million | $15.20 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 1994 | -1.68x | $-27.40 Million | $16.30 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 1993 | -1.98x | $-22.40 Million | $11.30 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 1992 | -1.20x | $-8.90 Million | $7.40 Million | ▼ -0.8% |
| 1991 | -1.19x | $-3.70 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 1990 | -1.04x | $-2.40 Million | $2.30 Million | — |