Gilead Sciences Inc (GILD) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Gilead Sciences Inc (GILD) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 35.7% as of December 2025. Working capital of $8.07 Billion (current assets of $19.89 Billion minus current liabilities of $11.81 Billion) is measured against net assets of $22.62 Billion. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See operational self-sufficiency of Gilead Sciences Inc to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Gilead Sciences Inc Working Capital to Net Assets (1990–2024)
This chart shows how Gilead Sciences Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 35 annual periods from 1990 to 2024. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 35.7%, reflecting working capital of $8.07 Billion against net assets of $22.62 Billion USD. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Gilead Sciences Inc asset portfolio.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Gilead Sciences Inc (1990–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Gilead Sciences Inc from 1990 to 2024, covering 35 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check GILD asset liquidity ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37.2% | $7.17 Billion | $19.25 Billion | $19.17 Billion | $12.00 Billion | ▲ +16.1 pp |
| 2023 | 21.1% | $4.80 Billion | $22.75 Billion | $16.09 Billion | $11.28 Billion | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 2022 | 15.1% | $3.21 Billion | $21.21 Billion | $14.44 Billion | $11.24 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2021 | 15.0% | $3.16 Billion | $21.06 Billion | $14.77 Billion | $11.61 Billion | ▼ -10.2 pp |
| 2020 | 25.2% | $4.60 Billion | $18.22 Billion | $16.00 Billion | $11.40 Billion | ▼ -65.4 pp |
| 2019 | 90.7% | $20.54 Billion | $22.65 Billion | $30.30 Billion | $9.76 Billion | ▼ -26.5 pp |
| 2018 | 117.2% | $25.23 Billion | $21.53 Billion | $35.84 Billion | $10.61 Billion | ▲ +18.7 pp |
| 2017 | 98.5% | $20.19 Billion | $20.50 Billion | $31.82 Billion | $11.63 Billion | ▼ -52.7 pp |
| 2016 | 151.1% | $29.26 Billion | $19.36 Billion | $38.48 Billion | $9.22 Billion | ▲ +24.9 pp |
| 2015 | 126.2% | $24.13 Billion | $19.11 Billion | $34.02 Billion | $9.89 Billion | ▲ +49.6 pp |
| 2014 | 76.7% | $12.13 Billion | $15.82 Billion | $17.75 Billion | $5.62 Billion | ▲ +71.7 pp |
| 2013 | 5.0% | $590.00 Million | $11.74 Billion | $7.00 Billion | $6.41 Billion | ▼ -15.1 pp |
| 2012 | 20.1% | $1.92 Billion | $9.54 Billion | $6.16 Billion | $4.24 Billion | ▼ -146.0 pp |
| 2011 | 166.1% | $11.40 Billion | $6.87 Billion | $13.92 Billion | $2.51 Billion | ▲ +113.1 pp |
| 2010 | 53.0% | $3.24 Billion | $6.12 Billion | $5.71 Billion | $2.46 Billion | ▲ +7.8 pp |
| 2009 | 45.2% | $2.94 Billion | $6.51 Billion | $4.81 Billion | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -23.3 pp |
| 2008 | 68.5% | $3.06 Billion | $4.47 Billion | $4.28 Billion | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +4.8 pp |
| 2007 | 63.7% | $2.29 Billion | $3.60 Billion | $3.03 Billion | $736.27 Million | ▼ -25.4 pp |
| 2006 | 89.1% | $1.66 Billion | $1.87 Billion | $2.43 Billion | $764.28 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2005 | 86.8% | $2.63 Billion | $3.03 Billion | $3.09 Billion | $465.16 Million | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2004 | 85.3% | $1.60 Billion | $1.87 Billion | $1.85 Billion | $253.45 Million | ▼ -22.4 pp |
| 2003 | 107.7% | $1.08 Billion | $1.00 Billion | $1.27 Billion | $185.90 Million | ▼ -81.2 pp |
| 2002 | 188.8% | $1.08 Billion | $571.34 Million | $1.18 Billion | $104.89 Million | ▲ +50.1 pp |
| 2001 | 138.7% | $627.64 Million | $452.44 Million | $707.76 Million | $80.12 Million | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2000 | 152.5% | $535.56 Million | $351.12 Million | $593.80 Million | $58.24 Million | ▲ +43.5 pp |
| 1999 | 109.0% | $324.10 Million | $297.29 Million | $371.98 Million | $47.88 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 1998 | 107.8% | $359.60 Million | $333.70 Million | $416.90 Million | $57.30 Million | ▲ +11.0 pp |
| 1997 | 96.7% | $306.90 Million | $317.30 Million | $340.30 Million | $33.40 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 1996 | 97.4% | $284.20 Million | $291.70 Million | $300.30 Million | $16.10 Million | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 1995 | 96.0% | $145.50 Million | $151.50 Million | $157.20 Million | $11.70 Million | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 1994 | 93.1% | $80.20 Million | $86.10 Million | $91.10 Million | $10.90 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 1993 | 93.8% | $108.10 Million | $115.30 Million | $116.90 Million | $8.80 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 1992 | 96.1% | $133.90 Million | $139.40 Million | $140.20 Million | $6.30 Million | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 1991 | 98.3% | $103.80 Million | $105.60 Million | $106.20 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +14.0 pp |
| 1990 | 84.3% | $8.60 Million | $10.20 Million | $10.40 Million | $1.80 Million | — |