Golar LNG Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Golar LNG Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $72.71 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.15 Billion) in one year. Check GLNG cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Golar LNG Limited (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Golar LNG Limited from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Golar LNG Limited across 26 annual periods. Check Golar LNG Limited earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Golar LNG Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Golar LNG Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Golar LNG Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Golar LNG Limited cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $428.67 Million | $3.26 Billion | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $318.24 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $135.25 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $298.88 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +161.0% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $230.00 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $145.78 Million | $2.68 Billion | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $106.55 Million | $2.88 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $116.67 Million | $2.98 Billion | ▲ +146.5% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $47.13 Million | $2.97 Billion | ▲ +195.2% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | $-39.67 Million | $2.38 Billion | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2015 | -0.03x | $-64.65 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▼ -264.9% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $24.87 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $67.72 Million | $858.17 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $238.28 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $116.61 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $96.33 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▲ +179.2% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $42.80 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $48.49 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $73.06 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $117.22 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $71.03 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $82.03 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $57.42 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $71.22 Million | $778.45 Million | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $42.04 Million | $655.77 Million | ▲ +16.2% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $29.51 Million | $534.95 Million | — |