Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $99.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.26 Billion) in one year. Explore Golar LNG Limited long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Golar LNG Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Golar LNG Limited across 26 annual periods. Also explore Golar LNG Limited asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Golar LNG Limited (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Golar LNG Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GLNG market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $428.67 Million | $3.26 Billion | ▼ -17.4% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $318.24 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▲ +74.5% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $135.25 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $298.88 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +161.0% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $230.00 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $145.78 Million | $2.68 Billion | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $106.55 Million | $2.88 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $116.67 Million | $2.98 Billion | ▲ +146.5% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $47.13 Million | $2.97 Billion | ▲ +195.2% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | $-39.67 Million | $2.38 Billion | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2015 | -0.03x | $-64.65 Million | $2.44 Billion | ▼ -264.9% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $24.87 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $67.72 Million | $858.17 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $238.28 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $116.61 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $96.33 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▲ +179.2% |
| 2009 | 0.02x | $42.80 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $48.49 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $73.06 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $117.22 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $71.03 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $82.03 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $57.42 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $71.22 Million | $778.45 Million | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $42.04 Million | $655.77 Million | ▲ +16.2% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $29.51 Million | $534.95 Million | — |