Groupon Inc (GRPN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: -0.02x

Groupon Inc (GRPN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-9.96 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($658.33 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Groupon Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

$-9.96 Million
USD

Total Liabilities

$658.33 Million
USD

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Groupon Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Groupon Inc across 17 annual periods. Also explore Groupon Inc (GRPN) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Groupon Inc (2009–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Groupon Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Groupon Inc market cap and net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (USD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.09x $64.50 Million $712.80 Million ▼ -7.5%
2024 0.10x $55.89 Million $571.64 Million ▲ +176.6%
2023 -0.13x $-77.98 Million $611.27 Million ▲ +26.4%
2022 -0.17x $-135.99 Million $784.26 Million ▼ -32.6%
2021 -0.13x $-123.96 Million $947.59 Million ▼ -168.2%
2020 -0.05x $-63.60 Million $1.30 Billion ▼ -181.5%
2019 0.06x $71.28 Million $1.19 Billion ▼ -60.5%
2018 0.15x $190.85 Million $1.26 Billion ▲ +59.9%
2017 0.09x $135.08 Million $1.43 Billion ▲ +21.1%
2016 0.08x $117.11 Million $1.50 Billion ▼ -59.3%
2015 0.19x $254.87 Million $1.33 Billion ▼ -2.6%
2014 0.20x $288.82 Million $1.46 Billion ▲ +20.3%
2013 0.16x $218.43 Million $1.33 Billion ▼ -20.7%
2012 0.21x $266.83 Million $1.29 Billion ▼ -23.4%
2011 0.27x $290.45 Million $1.08 Billion ▲ +15.7%
2010 0.23x $86.89 Million $372.04 Million ▲ +39.7%
2009 0.17x $7.51 Million $44.93 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.