Hennessy Ad Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hennessy Ad cash flow-to-debt ratio. Hennessy Ad (HNNA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.31 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($60.52 Million) in one year. Check Hennessy Ad cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Hennessy Ad (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Hennessy Ad from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Hennessy Ad across 25 annual periods. Check Hennessy Ad investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Hennessy Ad Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Hennessy Ad cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hennessy Ad. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Hennessy Ad cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | $13.79 Million | $62.72 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $9.28 Million | $60.79 Million | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $7.13 Million | $57.97 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2022 | 0.15x | $8.66 Million | $57.35 Million | ▼ -72.9% |
| 2021 | 0.56x | $10.39 Million | $18.64 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2020 | 0.64x | $10.62 Million | $16.61 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2019 | 0.41x | $14.39 Million | $34.68 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2018 | 0.56x | $21.53 Million | $38.50 Million | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2017 | 0.43x | $19.85 Million | $46.40 Million | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2016 | 0.38x | $18.19 Million | $47.61 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $14.44 Million | $50.04 Million | ▲ +16.2% |
| 2014 | 0.25x | $9.41 Million | $37.90 Million | ▲ +81.3% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $6.16 Million | $44.95 Million | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2012 | 0.27x | $2.04 Million | $7.68 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | $1.88 Million | $7.30 Million | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | $2.04 Million | $7.40 Million | ▲ +88.5% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $873.00K | $5.98 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2008 | 0.23x | $2.22 Million | $9.81 Million | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $5.82 Million | $12.35 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2006 | 0.44x | $6.27 Million | $14.16 Million | ▲ +98.6% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $3.44 Million | $15.43 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2004 | 0.38x | $3.50 Million | $9.21 Million | ▼ -63.3% |
| 2003 | 1.04x | $1.36 Million | $1.31 Million | ▼ -63.8% |
| 2002 | 2.86x | $358.42K | $125.22K | ▲ +1494.9% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | $734.29K | $4.09 Million | — |