Hennessy Ad (HNNA) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Hennessy Ad (HNNA) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 17.8% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($82.25 Million) from net assets ($100.02 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See HNNA net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Hennessy Ad Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2001–2025)
This chart shows how Hennessy Ad's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 25 annual periods from 2001 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 17.8%, reflecting net assets of $100.02 Million with intangible assets of $82.25 Million USD. Also explore Hennessy Ad equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Hennessy Ad (2001–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Hennessy Ad from 2001 to 2025, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see HNNA stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | $97.74 Million | $0.00 | $160.46 Million | ▲ +90.1 pp |
| 2024 | 9.9% | $91.31 Million | $82.25 Million | $152.10 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2023 | 7.4% | $87.75 Million | $81.26 Million | $145.72 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2022 | 6.3% | $86.30 Million | $80.87 Million | $143.65 Million | ▲ +3.1 pp |
| 2021 | 3.1% | $83.26 Million | $80.64 Million | $101.91 Million | ▲ +6.3 pp |
| 2020 | -3.2% | $78.18 Million | $80.64 Million | $94.79 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2019 | -6.8% | $75.53 Million | $80.64 Million | $110.21 Million | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2018 | -10.1% | $70.98 Million | $78.16 Million | $109.48 Million | ▲ +34.7 pp |
| 2017 | -44.8% | $51.53 Million | $74.63 Million | $97.93 Million | ▲ +54.4 pp |
| 2016 | -99.2% | $37.33 Million | $74.36 Million | $84.94 Million | ▲ +72.2 pp |
| 2015 | -171.4% | $23.09 Million | $62.68 Million | $73.13 Million | ▼ -104.4 pp |
| 2014 | -67.0% | $37.41 Million | $62.49 Million | $75.31 Million | ▲ +42.6 pp |
| 2013 | -109.6% | $29.79 Million | $62.43 Million | $74.73 Million | ▼ -120.2 pp |
| 2012 | 10.6% | $25.22 Million | $22.56 Million | $32.90 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2011 | 10.3% | $24.84 Million | $22.28 Million | $32.14 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2010 | 9.0% | $24.50 Million | $22.28 Million | $31.90 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2009 | 7.9% | $24.12 Million | $22.22 Million | $30.10 Million | ▼ -13.0 pp |
| 2008 | 20.9% | $24.52 Million | $19.41 Million | $34.34 Million | ▲ +4.0 pp |
| 2007 | 16.9% | $23.36 Million | $19.41 Million | $35.70 Million | ▼ -78.1 pp |
| 2006 | 95.0% | $18.95 Million | $943.00K | $33.11 Million | ▲ +5.9 pp |
| 2005 | 89.2% | $13.68 Million | $1.48 Million | $29.11 Million | ▼ -10.8 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $10.71 Million | $0.00 | $19.91 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $7.84 Million | $0.00 | $9.15 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $6.81 Million | $0.00 | $6.93 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | $205.57K | $0.00 | $4.30 Million | — |