Hallador Energy Company (HNRG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hallador Energy Company (HNRG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $20.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($243.06 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Hallador Energy Company to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hallador Energy Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hallador Energy Company across 31 annual periods. Also explore Hallador Energy Company net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hallador Energy Company (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hallador Energy Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Hallador Energy Company stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $81.13 Million | $277.63 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $65.93 Million | $264.83 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | $59.41 Million | $321.19 Million | ▲ +49.9% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $54.17 Million | $439.05 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | $47.97 Million | $167.75 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | $52.58 Million | $194.87 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $38.24 Million | $230.10 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $51.57 Million | $256.62 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | $61.57 Million | $268.87 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $60.92 Million | $311.62 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | $94.66 Million | $338.67 Million | ▲ +95.0% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | $55.87 Million | $389.71 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2013 | 0.35x | $27.18 Million | $77.08 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $37.04 Million | $67.20 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2011 | 0.85x | $60.72 Million | $71.44 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2010 | 0.76x | $45.55 Million | $59.93 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2009 | 0.80x | $45.22 Million | $56.46 Million | ▲ +162.7% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $18.75 Million | $61.50 Million | ▲ +4575.2% |
| 2007 | -0.01x | $-325.00K | $47.70 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2006 | -0.06x | $-2.10 Million | $33.64 Million | ▼ -137.1% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | $513.00K | $3.05 Million | ▲ +145.0% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $156.00K | $2.27 Million | ▼ -90.4% |
| 2003 | 0.71x | $2.51 Million | $3.53 Million | ▲ +90.3% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $683.00K | $1.82 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2001 | 1.20x | $2.04 Million | $1.69 Million | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2000 | 2.18x | $3.46 Million | $1.59 Million | ▲ +685.6% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $713.00K | $2.58 Million | ▲ +1103.7% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-240.00K | $8.70 Million | ▼ -168.0% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $450.00K | $11.10 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $1.77 Million | $6.60 Million | ▲ +231.8% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | $590.00K | $7.30 Million | — |