Hallador Energy Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hallador Energy Company cash flow-to-debt ratio. Hallador Energy Company (HNRG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-23.89 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($277.40 Million) in one year. Check Hallador Energy Company earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Hallador Energy Company (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Hallador Energy Company from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Hallador Energy Company across 31 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Hallador Energy Company reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Hallador Energy Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Hallador Energy Company cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hallador Energy Company. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see HNRG cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $81.13 Million | $277.63 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $65.93 Million | $264.83 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | $59.41 Million | $321.19 Million | ▲ +49.9% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $54.17 Million | $439.05 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | $47.97 Million | $167.75 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | $52.58 Million | $194.87 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $38.24 Million | $230.10 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $51.57 Million | $256.62 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | $61.57 Million | $268.87 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $60.92 Million | $311.62 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | $94.66 Million | $338.67 Million | ▲ +95.0% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | $55.87 Million | $389.71 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2013 | 0.35x | $27.18 Million | $77.08 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $37.04 Million | $67.20 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2011 | 0.85x | $60.72 Million | $71.44 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2010 | 0.76x | $45.55 Million | $59.93 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2009 | 0.80x | $45.22 Million | $56.46 Million | ▲ +162.7% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $18.75 Million | $61.50 Million | ▲ +4575.2% |
| 2007 | -0.01x | $-325.00K | $47.70 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2006 | -0.06x | $-2.10 Million | $33.64 Million | ▼ -137.1% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | $513.00K | $3.05 Million | ▲ +145.0% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $156.00K | $2.27 Million | ▼ -90.4% |
| 2003 | 0.71x | $2.51 Million | $3.53 Million | ▲ +90.3% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $683.00K | $1.82 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2001 | 1.20x | $2.04 Million | $1.69 Million | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2000 | 2.18x | $3.46 Million | $1.59 Million | ▲ +685.6% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $713.00K | $2.58 Million | ▲ +1103.7% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-240.00K | $8.70 Million | ▼ -168.0% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $450.00K | $11.10 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $1.77 Million | $6.60 Million | ▲ +231.8% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | $590.00K | $7.30 Million | — |