Hallador Energy Company (HNRG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Hallador Energy Company (HNRG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-23.89 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($277.40 Million) in one year. See HNRG financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Hallador Energy Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Hallador Energy Company across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Hallador Energy Company operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Hallador Energy Company (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Hallador Energy Company. Check Hallador Energy Company cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $81.13 Million | $277.63 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $65.93 Million | $264.83 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | $59.41 Million | $321.19 Million | ▲ +49.9% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $54.17 Million | $439.05 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | $47.97 Million | $167.75 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | $52.58 Million | $194.87 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $38.24 Million | $230.10 Million | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $51.57 Million | $256.62 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | $61.57 Million | $268.87 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $60.92 Million | $311.62 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | $94.66 Million | $338.67 Million | ▲ +95.0% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | $55.87 Million | $389.71 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2013 | 0.35x | $27.18 Million | $77.08 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $37.04 Million | $67.20 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2011 | 0.85x | $60.72 Million | $71.44 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2010 | 0.76x | $45.55 Million | $59.93 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2009 | 0.80x | $45.22 Million | $56.46 Million | ▲ +162.7% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $18.75 Million | $61.50 Million | ▲ +4575.2% |
| 2007 | -0.01x | $-325.00K | $47.70 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2006 | -0.06x | $-2.10 Million | $33.64 Million | ▼ -137.1% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | $513.00K | $3.05 Million | ▲ +145.0% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $156.00K | $2.27 Million | ▼ -90.4% |
| 2003 | 0.71x | $2.51 Million | $3.53 Million | ▲ +90.3% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $683.00K | $1.82 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2001 | 1.20x | $2.04 Million | $1.69 Million | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2000 | 2.18x | $3.46 Million | $1.59 Million | ▲ +685.6% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $713.00K | $2.58 Million | ▲ +1103.7% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-240.00K | $8.70 Million | ▼ -168.0% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $450.00K | $11.10 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $1.77 Million | $6.60 Million | ▲ +231.8% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | $590.00K | $7.30 Million | — |