IES Holdings Inc (IESC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
IES Holdings Inc (IESC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $133.92 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($916.80 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of IES Holdings Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
IES Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for IES Holdings Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore IES Holdings Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for IES Holdings Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for IES Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see IESC company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.40x | $286.10 Million | $707.70 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2024 | 0.40x | $234.40 Million | $591.92 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $153.90 Million | $481.66 Million | ▲ +966.8% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $16.30 Million | $544.23 Million | ▼ -68.7% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $37.90 Million | $396.07 Million | ▼ -65.6% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | $76.70 Million | $275.41 Million | ▲ +40.8% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $38.70 Million | $195.72 Million | ▲ +220.9% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $12.22 Million | $198.35 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $22.30 Million | $184.50 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | $25.00 Million | $169.20 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $11.51 Million | $124.27 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $12.60 Million | $113.14 Million | ▲ +565.4% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $1.95 Million | $116.77 Million | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | $-7.37 Million | $111.56 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2011 | -0.10x | $-11.85 Million | $115.94 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-13.20 Million | $106.66 Million | ▼ -248.7% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $11.31 Million | $135.88 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $14.71 Million | $172.67 Million | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | $58.86 Million | $199.50 Million | ▲ +245.2% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $18.88 Million | $220.87 Million | ▲ +322.6% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | $-15.38 Million | $400.51 Million | ▼ -366.6% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $6.30 Million | $437.76 Million | ▼ -83.5% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $39.30 Million | $449.58 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $53.37 Million | $458.75 Million | ▲ +580.2% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $8.63 Million | $504.86 Million | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $43.21 Million | $512.24 Million | ▲ +571.1% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-7.01 Million | $391.33 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $8.34 Million | $199.76 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $1.05 Million | $23.20 Million | — |