IES Holdings Inc (IESC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
IES Holdings Inc (IESC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $29.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.04 Billion) in one year. See IES Holdings Inc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
IES Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for IES Holdings Inc across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see IES Holdings Inc (IESC) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for IES Holdings Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for IES Holdings Inc. Check IESC cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.40x | $286.10 Million | $707.70 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2024 | 0.40x | $234.40 Million | $591.92 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $153.90 Million | $481.66 Million | ▲ +966.8% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $16.30 Million | $544.23 Million | ▼ -68.7% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $37.90 Million | $396.07 Million | ▼ -65.6% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | $76.70 Million | $275.41 Million | ▲ +40.8% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $38.70 Million | $195.72 Million | ▲ +220.9% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $12.22 Million | $198.35 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $22.30 Million | $184.50 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | $25.00 Million | $169.20 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $11.51 Million | $124.27 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $12.60 Million | $113.14 Million | ▲ +565.4% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $1.95 Million | $116.77 Million | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | $-7.37 Million | $111.56 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2011 | -0.10x | $-11.85 Million | $115.94 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-13.20 Million | $106.66 Million | ▼ -248.7% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $11.31 Million | $135.88 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $14.71 Million | $172.67 Million | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | $58.86 Million | $199.50 Million | ▲ +245.2% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $18.88 Million | $220.87 Million | ▲ +322.6% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | $-15.38 Million | $400.51 Million | ▼ -366.6% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $6.30 Million | $437.76 Million | ▼ -83.5% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $39.30 Million | $449.58 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $53.37 Million | $458.75 Million | ▲ +580.2% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $8.63 Million | $504.86 Million | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $43.21 Million | $512.24 Million | ▲ +571.1% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-7.01 Million | $391.33 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $8.34 Million | $199.76 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $1.05 Million | $23.20 Million | — |