IES Holdings Inc (IESC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
IES Holdings Inc (IESC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $133.92 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($916.80 Million) in one year. See IES Holdings Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
IES Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for IES Holdings Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore IES Holdings Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for IES Holdings Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for IES Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see IESC company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.40x | $286.10 Million | $707.70 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2024 | 0.40x | $234.40 Million | $591.92 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $153.90 Million | $481.66 Million | ▲ +966.8% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $16.30 Million | $544.23 Million | ▼ -68.7% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $37.90 Million | $396.07 Million | ▼ -65.6% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | $76.70 Million | $275.41 Million | ▲ +40.8% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $38.70 Million | $195.72 Million | ▲ +220.9% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $12.22 Million | $198.35 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $22.30 Million | $184.50 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | $25.00 Million | $169.20 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $11.51 Million | $124.27 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $12.60 Million | $113.14 Million | ▲ +565.4% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $1.95 Million | $116.77 Million | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | $-7.37 Million | $111.56 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2011 | -0.10x | $-11.85 Million | $115.94 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-13.20 Million | $106.66 Million | ▼ -248.7% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $11.31 Million | $135.88 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $14.71 Million | $172.67 Million | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | $58.86 Million | $199.50 Million | ▲ +245.2% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $18.88 Million | $220.87 Million | ▲ +322.6% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | $-15.38 Million | $400.51 Million | ▼ -366.6% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $6.30 Million | $437.76 Million | ▼ -83.5% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $39.30 Million | $449.58 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $53.37 Million | $458.75 Million | ▲ +580.2% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $8.63 Million | $504.86 Million | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $43.21 Million | $512.24 Million | ▲ +571.1% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-7.01 Million | $391.33 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $8.34 Million | $199.76 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $1.05 Million | $23.20 Million | — |