IES Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
IES Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. IES Holdings Inc (IESC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $29.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.04 Billion) in one year. Check IES Holdings Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of IES Holdings Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of IES Holdings Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for IES Holdings Inc across 29 annual periods. Check IESC cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
IES Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
IES Holdings Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for IES Holdings Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of IES Holdings Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.40x | $286.10 Million | $707.70 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2024 | 0.40x | $234.40 Million | $591.92 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2023 | 0.32x | $153.90 Million | $481.66 Million | ▲ +966.8% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $16.30 Million | $544.23 Million | ▼ -68.7% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $37.90 Million | $396.07 Million | ▼ -65.6% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | $76.70 Million | $275.41 Million | ▲ +40.8% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $38.70 Million | $195.72 Million | ▲ +220.9% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $12.22 Million | $198.35 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $22.30 Million | $184.50 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | $25.00 Million | $169.20 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $11.51 Million | $124.27 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $12.60 Million | $113.14 Million | ▲ +565.4% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $1.95 Million | $116.77 Million | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | $-7.37 Million | $111.56 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2011 | -0.10x | $-11.85 Million | $115.94 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2010 | -0.12x | $-13.20 Million | $106.66 Million | ▼ -248.7% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $11.31 Million | $135.88 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $14.71 Million | $172.67 Million | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | $58.86 Million | $199.50 Million | ▲ +245.2% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $18.88 Million | $220.87 Million | ▲ +322.6% |
| 2005 | -0.04x | $-15.38 Million | $400.51 Million | ▼ -366.6% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $6.30 Million | $437.76 Million | ▼ -83.5% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $39.30 Million | $449.58 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $53.37 Million | $458.75 Million | ▲ +580.2% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $8.63 Million | $504.86 Million | ▼ -79.7% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $43.21 Million | $512.24 Million | ▲ +571.1% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-7.01 Million | $391.33 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $8.34 Million | $199.76 Million | ▼ -7.8% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $1.05 Million | $23.20 Million | — |