IES Holdings Inc (IESC) — Net Asset Quality Index
IES Holdings Inc (IESC) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 54.2% as of June 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $2.28 Billion minus total liabilities of $1.04 Billion yields net assets of $1.23 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read IESC total debt and obligations for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
IES Holdings Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2025)
This chart shows how IES Holdings Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of June 2026, the index stands at 54.2%, representing net assets of $1.23 Billion against total assets of $2.28 Billion USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see IES Holdings Inc (IESC) market capitalisation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for IES Holdings Inc (1997–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for IES Holdings Inc from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check IES Holdings Inc (IESC) strategic investment index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 55.6% | $887.96 Million | $1.60 Billion | $707.70 Million | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2024 | 52.4% | $652.11 Million | $1.24 Billion | $591.92 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2023 | 50.9% | $499.94 Million | $981.60 Million | $481.66 Million | ▲ +9.2 pp |
| 2022 | 41.8% | $390.48 Million | $934.71 Million | $544.23 Million | ▼ -6.6 pp |
| 2021 | 48.3% | $370.55 Million | $766.62 Million | $396.07 Million | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 2020 | 50.9% | $285.12 Million | $560.53 Million | $275.41 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2019 | 56.0% | $249.54 Million | $445.26 Million | $195.72 Million | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2018 | 53.0% | $223.64 Million | $421.99 Million | $198.35 Million | ▼ -3.5 pp |
| 2017 | 56.5% | $240.00 Million | $424.50 Million | $184.50 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2016 | 57.1% | $225.10 Million | $394.30 Million | $169.20 Million | ▲ +12.2 pp |
| 2015 | 44.9% | $101.41 Million | $225.68 Million | $124.27 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2014 | 43.7% | $87.97 Million | $201.11 Million | $113.14 Million | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 2013 | 34.9% | $62.49 Million | $179.25 Million | $116.77 Million | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2012 | 32.3% | $53.16 Million | $164.71 Million | $111.56 Million | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2011 | 35.7% | $64.30 Million | $180.24 Million | $115.94 Million | ▼ -13.0 pp |
| 2010 | 48.7% | $101.20 Million | $207.86 Million | $106.66 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2009 | 49.4% | $132.55 Million | $268.43 Million | $135.88 Million | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2008 | 46.0% | $147.11 Million | $319.78 Million | $172.67 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2007 | 43.6% | $153.93 Million | $353.42 Million | $199.50 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2006 | 41.2% | $154.64 Million | $375.51 Million | $220.87 Million | ▲ +37.4 pp |
| 2005 | 3.8% | $15.86 Million | $416.37 Million | $400.51 Million | ▼ -20.8 pp |
| 2004 | 24.6% | $143.17 Million | $580.93 Million | $437.76 Million | ▼ -12.4 pp |
| 2003 | 37.1% | $264.91 Million | $714.49 Million | $449.58 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2002 | 35.5% | $252.78 Million | $711.53 Million | $458.75 Million | ▼ -15.6 pp |
| 2001 | 51.2% | $528.64 Million | $1.03 Billion | $504.86 Million | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2000 | 49.8% | $507.75 Million | $1.02 Billion | $512.24 Million | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 1999 | 54.4% | $467.17 Million | $858.49 Million | $391.33 Million | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 1998 | 60.2% | $302.70 Million | $502.47 Million | $199.76 Million | ▲ +25.0 pp |
| 1997 | 35.2% | $12.60 Million | $35.80 Million | $23.20 Million | — |