Insmed Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Insmed Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Insmed Inc (INSM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.16x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-219.76 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.42 Billion) in one year. Check Insmed Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Insmed Inc (1999–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Insmed Inc from 1999 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Insmed Inc across 26 annual periods. Check INSM cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Insmed Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2024)
Insmed Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Insmed Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Insmed Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.39x | $-683.88 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2023 | -0.32x | $-536.25 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -26.4% |
| 2022 | -0.26x | $-400.44 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2021 | -0.44x | $-363.30 Million | $833.04 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2020 | -0.42x | $-219.35 Million | $520.27 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2019 | -0.52x | $-250.65 Million | $480.62 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2018 | -0.65x | $-257.98 Million | $396.29 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 2017 | -1.58x | $-159.62 Million | $100.99 Million | ▲ +10.1% |
| 2016 | -1.76x | $-146.71 Million | $83.47 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2015 | -2.24x | $-100.70 Million | $44.86 Million | ▼ -55.5% |
| 2014 | -1.44x | $-64.42 Million | $44.63 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2013 | -1.41x | $-46.66 Million | $33.17 Million | ▼ -48.2% |
| 2012 | -0.95x | $-31.01 Million | $32.68 Million | ▲ +82.5% |
| 2011 | -5.43x | $-30.20 Million | $5.57 Million | ▼ -140.5% |
| 2010 | -2.26x | $-7.72 Million | $3.42 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2009 | -3.96x | $-11.01 Million | $2.78 Million | ▼ -150.3% |
| 2008 | -1.58x | $-11.99 Million | $7.58 Million | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2007 | -3.15x | $-25.25 Million | $8.01 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2006 | -2.92x | $-42.20 Million | $14.47 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2005 | -2.25x | $-27.77 Million | $12.34 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2004 | -4.31x | $-24.90 Million | $5.78 Million | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2003 | -3.00x | $-10.76 Million | $3.59 Million | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2002 | -4.96x | $-24.08 Million | $4.86 Million | ▼ -85.7% |
| 2001 | -2.67x | $-31.78 Million | $11.91 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2000 | -3.61x | $-21.42 Million | $5.94 Million | ▲ +58.4% |
| 1999 | -8.67x | $-7.23 Million | $833.94K | — |