Insmed Inc (INSM) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Insmed Inc (INSM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 91.1% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($84.59 Million) from net assets ($945.57 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Insmed Inc (INSM) liquidity to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Insmed Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1999–2024)
This chart shows how Insmed Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 24 annual periods from 1999 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 91.1%, reflecting net assets of $945.57 Million with intangible assets of $84.59 Million USD. See Insmed Inc defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Insmed Inc (1999–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Insmed Inc from 1999 to 2024, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Insmed Inc stock valuation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 79.4% | $285.38 Million | $58.65 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +57.6 pp |
| 2022 | 21.8% | $87.95 Million | $68.76 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -60.2 pp |
| 2021 | 82.0% | $410.47 Million | $73.81 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2020 | 82.1% | $275.88 Million | $49.26 Million | $796.15 Million | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2019 | 79.5% | $261.67 Million | $53.68 Million | $742.30 Million | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 2018 | 71.8% | $208.27 Million | $58.67 Million | $604.56 Million | ▼ -12.1 pp |
| 2017 | 83.9% | $361.06 Million | $58.20 Million | $462.05 Million | ▲ +21.6 pp |
| 2016 | 62.3% | $154.48 Million | $58.20 Million | $237.96 Million | ▼ -19.0 pp |
| 2015 | 81.3% | $311.70 Million | $58.20 Million | $356.56 Million | ▲ +12.6 pp |
| 2014 | 68.7% | $186.24 Million | $58.20 Million | $230.86 Million | ▲ +9.4 pp |
| 2013 | 59.4% | $143.32 Million | $58.20 Million | $176.50 Million | ▲ +7.5 pp |
| 2012 | 51.9% | $120.88 Million | $58.20 Million | $153.56 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2011 | 56.7% | $134.27 Million | $58.20 Million | $139.83 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2010 | 56.3% | $192.84 Million | $84.19 Million | $196.26 Million | ▼ -43.7 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $123.91 Million | $0.00 | $126.69 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $11.49 Million | $0.00 | $19.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $13.88 Million | $0.00 | $28.35 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $10.53 Million | $0.00 | $22.87 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $7.24 Million | $0.00 | $13.01 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $26.22 Million | $0.00 | $29.81 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $23.45 Million | $0.00 | $28.31 Million | ▲ +25.8 pp |
| 2001 | 74.2% | $59.70 Million | $15.38 Million | $71.61 Million | ▼ -9.0 pp |
| 2000 | 83.2% | $96.78 Million | $16.22 Million | $102.72 Million | ▼ -16.8 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $4.46 Million | $0.00 | $5.30 Million | — |