Insmed Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Insmed Inc tangible net worth ratio. Insmed Inc (INSM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 91.1% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($84.59 Million) from net assets ($945.57 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore how fast is Insmed Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Insmed Inc (1999–2024)
Tangible net worth ratio of Insmed Inc from 1999 to 2024. This chart shows how Insmed Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 24 annual periods from 1999 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 91.1%, reflecting net assets of $945.57 Million with intangible assets of $84.59 Million USD. Check Insmed Inc strategic asset allocation index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Insmed Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1999–2024)
Insmed Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 1999 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Insmed Inc from 1999 to 2024, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see INSM market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 79.4% | $285.38 Million | $58.65 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +57.6 pp |
| 2022 | 21.8% | $87.95 Million | $68.76 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -60.2 pp |
| 2021 | 82.0% | $410.47 Million | $73.81 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2020 | 82.1% | $275.88 Million | $49.26 Million | $796.15 Million | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2019 | 79.5% | $261.67 Million | $53.68 Million | $742.30 Million | ▲ +7.7 pp |
| 2018 | 71.8% | $208.27 Million | $58.67 Million | $604.56 Million | ▼ -12.1 pp |
| 2017 | 83.9% | $361.06 Million | $58.20 Million | $462.05 Million | ▲ +21.6 pp |
| 2016 | 62.3% | $154.48 Million | $58.20 Million | $237.96 Million | ▼ -19.0 pp |
| 2015 | 81.3% | $311.70 Million | $58.20 Million | $356.56 Million | ▲ +12.6 pp |
| 2014 | 68.7% | $186.24 Million | $58.20 Million | $230.86 Million | ▲ +9.4 pp |
| 2013 | 59.4% | $143.32 Million | $58.20 Million | $176.50 Million | ▲ +7.5 pp |
| 2012 | 51.9% | $120.88 Million | $58.20 Million | $153.56 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2011 | 56.7% | $134.27 Million | $58.20 Million | $139.83 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2010 | 56.3% | $192.84 Million | $84.19 Million | $196.26 Million | ▼ -43.7 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $123.91 Million | $0.00 | $126.69 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $11.49 Million | $0.00 | $19.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $13.88 Million | $0.00 | $28.35 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $10.53 Million | $0.00 | $22.87 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $7.24 Million | $0.00 | $13.01 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $26.22 Million | $0.00 | $29.81 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $23.45 Million | $0.00 | $28.31 Million | ▲ +25.8 pp |
| 2001 | 74.2% | $59.70 Million | $15.38 Million | $71.61 Million | ▼ -9.0 pp |
| 2000 | 83.2% | $96.78 Million | $16.22 Million | $102.72 Million | ▼ -16.8 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $4.46 Million | $0.00 | $5.30 Million | — |