Innovative Solutions and Support (ISSC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Innovative Solutions and Support (ISSC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($41.19 Million) in one year. See Innovative Solutions and Support (ISSC) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Innovative Solutions and Support Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Innovative Solutions and Support across 27 annual periods. Also explore ISSC net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Innovative Solutions and Support (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Innovative Solutions and Support. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Innovative Solutions and Support market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.34x | $13.30 Million | $38.76 Million | ▲ +111.7% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $5.80 Million | $35.74 Million | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $2.10 Million | $24.32 Million | ▼ -94.4% |
| 2022 | 1.54x | $6.09 Million | $3.96 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2021 | 1.84x | $4.59 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +1054.0% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $2.19 Million | $13.78 Million | ▼ -82.3% |
| 2019 | 0.90x | $2.11 Million | $2.35 Million | ▲ +279.3% |
| 2018 | -0.50x | $-1.74 Million | $3.48 Million | ▼ -128.3% |
| 2017 | 1.77x | $6.07 Million | $3.43 Million | ▲ +80.8% |
| 2016 | 0.98x | $3.56 Million | $3.64 Million | ▲ +232.5% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $1.40 Million | $4.76 Million | ▲ +395.4% |
| 2014 | -0.10x | $-712.21K | $7.15 Million | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2013 | -0.32x | $-2.15 Million | $6.64 Million | ▼ -229.6% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $1.38 Million | $5.52 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2011 | 0.57x | $2.28 Million | $4.00 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 2010 | 1.36x | $5.60 Million | $4.12 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2009 | 1.04x | $5.32 Million | $5.14 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2008 | 1.04x | $13.60 Million | $13.09 Million | ▲ +236.1% |
| 2007 | -0.76x | $-10.58 Million | $13.85 Million | ▼ -322.9% |
| 2006 | -0.18x | $-1.63 Million | $9.03 Million | ▼ -110.3% |
| 2005 | 1.74x | $16.00 Million | $9.17 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2004 | 1.34x | $16.09 Million | $12.01 Million | ▲ +94.9% |
| 2003 | 0.69x | $6.06 Million | $8.82 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 2002 | 1.69x | $13.35 Million | $7.89 Million | ▲ +262.9% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | $3.58 Million | $7.67 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2000 | 0.25x | $2.48 Million | $9.92 Million | ▼ -84.6% |
| 1999 | 1.62x | $5.96 Million | $3.68 Million | — |