Innovative Solutions and Support Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Innovative Solutions and Support cash flow-to-debt ratio. Innovative Solutions and Support (ISSC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.20x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($41.19 Million) in one year. Check how high is Innovative Solutions and Support's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Innovative Solutions and Support (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Innovative Solutions and Support from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Innovative Solutions and Support across 27 annual periods. Check Innovative Solutions and Support investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Innovative Solutions and Support Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Innovative Solutions and Support cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Innovative Solutions and Support. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Innovative Solutions and Support cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.34x | $13.30 Million | $38.76 Million | ▲ +111.7% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $5.80 Million | $35.74 Million | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $2.10 Million | $24.32 Million | ▼ -94.4% |
| 2022 | 1.54x | $6.09 Million | $3.96 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2021 | 1.84x | $4.59 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +1054.0% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $2.19 Million | $13.78 Million | ▼ -82.3% |
| 2019 | 0.90x | $2.11 Million | $2.35 Million | ▲ +279.3% |
| 2018 | -0.50x | $-1.74 Million | $3.48 Million | ▼ -128.3% |
| 2017 | 1.77x | $6.07 Million | $3.43 Million | ▲ +80.8% |
| 2016 | 0.98x | $3.56 Million | $3.64 Million | ▲ +232.5% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $1.40 Million | $4.76 Million | ▲ +395.4% |
| 2014 | -0.10x | $-712.21K | $7.15 Million | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2013 | -0.32x | $-2.15 Million | $6.64 Million | ▼ -229.6% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $1.38 Million | $5.52 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2011 | 0.57x | $2.28 Million | $4.00 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 2010 | 1.36x | $5.60 Million | $4.12 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2009 | 1.04x | $5.32 Million | $5.14 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2008 | 1.04x | $13.60 Million | $13.09 Million | ▲ +236.1% |
| 2007 | -0.76x | $-10.58 Million | $13.85 Million | ▼ -322.9% |
| 2006 | -0.18x | $-1.63 Million | $9.03 Million | ▼ -110.3% |
| 2005 | 1.74x | $16.00 Million | $9.17 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 2004 | 1.34x | $16.09 Million | $12.01 Million | ▲ +94.9% |
| 2003 | 0.69x | $6.06 Million | $8.82 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 2002 | 1.69x | $13.35 Million | $7.89 Million | ▲ +262.9% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | $3.58 Million | $7.67 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2000 | 0.25x | $2.48 Million | $9.92 Million | ▼ -84.6% |
| 1999 | 1.62x | $5.96 Million | $3.68 Million | — |