JAKKS Pacific Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
JAKKS Pacific Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. JAKKS Pacific Inc (JAKK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.35 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($200.62 Million) in one year. Check JAKK cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of JAKKS Pacific Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of JAKKS Pacific Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for JAKKS Pacific Inc across 30 annual periods. Check JAKK total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
JAKKS Pacific Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
JAKKS Pacific Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for JAKKS Pacific Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does JAKKS Pacific Inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $8.49 Million | $193.09 Million | ▼ -77.0% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $38.95 Million | $204.04 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2023 | 0.33x | $66.40 Million | $202.84 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2022 | 0.35x | $86.10 Million | $246.82 Million | ▲ +1875.0% |
| 2021 | -0.02x | $-5.88 Million | $299.15 Million | ▼ -114.2% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $43.57 Million | $314.69 Million | ▲ +128.8% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $21.83 Million | $360.72 Million | ▲ +2923.6% |
| 2018 | 0.00x | $-624.00K | $291.19 Million | ▼ -105.2% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $11.39 Million | $275.84 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $16.72 Million | $329.10 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $66.29 Million | $352.49 Million | ▲ +199.1% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | $-79.09 Million | $416.70 Million | ▼ -154.1% |
| 2013 | -0.07x | $-22.49 Million | $301.16 Million | ▼ -205.2% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $24.18 Million | $340.55 Million | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $44.26 Million | $221.64 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | $67.47 Million | $221.00 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $98.77 Million | $261.98 Million | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2008 | 0.22x | $60.80 Million | $273.05 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | $87.66 Million | $291.69 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $63.71 Million | $272.61 Million | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $71.06 Million | $229.30 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2004 | 0.54x | $131.39 Million | $245.28 Million | ▲ +1028.7% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $7.19 Million | $151.41 Million | ▼ -96.5% |
| 2002 | 1.37x | $66.23 Million | $48.23 Million | ▲ +307.2% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $13.36 Million | $39.64 Million | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2000 | 0.68x | $29.99 Million | $44.19 Million | ▲ +201.4% |
| 1999 | -0.67x | $-30.40 Million | $45.40 Million | ▼ -216.6% |
| 1998 | 0.57x | $12.00 Million | $20.90 Million | ▲ +215.8% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $3.20 Million | $17.60 Million | ▲ +164.9% |
| 1996 | -0.28x | $-700.00K | $2.50 Million | — |