JAKKS Pacific Inc (JAKK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
JAKKS Pacific Inc (JAKK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $21.65 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($158.46 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of JAKKS Pacific Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
JAKKS Pacific Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for JAKKS Pacific Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore JAKK asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for JAKKS Pacific Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for JAKKS Pacific Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see JAKKS Pacific Inc (JAKK) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $8.49 Million | $193.09 Million | ▼ -77.0% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $38.95 Million | $204.04 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2023 | 0.33x | $66.40 Million | $202.84 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2022 | 0.35x | $86.10 Million | $246.82 Million | ▲ +1875.0% |
| 2021 | -0.02x | $-5.88 Million | $299.15 Million | ▼ -114.2% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $43.57 Million | $314.69 Million | ▲ +128.8% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $21.83 Million | $360.72 Million | ▲ +2923.6% |
| 2018 | 0.00x | $-624.00K | $291.19 Million | ▼ -105.2% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $11.39 Million | $275.84 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $16.72 Million | $329.10 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $66.29 Million | $352.49 Million | ▲ +199.1% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | $-79.09 Million | $416.70 Million | ▼ -154.1% |
| 2013 | -0.07x | $-22.49 Million | $301.16 Million | ▼ -205.2% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $24.18 Million | $340.55 Million | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $44.26 Million | $221.64 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | $67.47 Million | $221.00 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $98.77 Million | $261.98 Million | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2008 | 0.22x | $60.80 Million | $273.05 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | $87.66 Million | $291.69 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $63.71 Million | $272.61 Million | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $71.06 Million | $229.30 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2004 | 0.54x | $131.39 Million | $245.28 Million | ▲ +1028.7% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $7.19 Million | $151.41 Million | ▼ -96.5% |
| 2002 | 1.37x | $66.23 Million | $48.23 Million | ▲ +307.2% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $13.36 Million | $39.64 Million | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2000 | 0.68x | $29.99 Million | $44.19 Million | ▲ +201.4% |
| 1999 | -0.67x | $-30.40 Million | $45.40 Million | ▼ -216.6% |
| 1998 | 0.57x | $12.00 Million | $20.90 Million | ▲ +215.8% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $3.20 Million | $17.60 Million | ▲ +164.9% |
| 1996 | -0.28x | $-700.00K | $2.50 Million | — |