JAKKS Pacific Inc (JAKK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
JAKKS Pacific Inc (JAKK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $21.65 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($158.46 Million) in one year. See JAKK free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
JAKKS Pacific Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for JAKKS Pacific Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore JAKKS Pacific Inc (JAKK) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for JAKKS Pacific Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for JAKKS Pacific Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see JAKK market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $8.49 Million | $193.09 Million | ▼ -77.0% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $38.95 Million | $204.04 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2023 | 0.33x | $66.40 Million | $202.84 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2022 | 0.35x | $86.10 Million | $246.82 Million | ▲ +1875.0% |
| 2021 | -0.02x | $-5.88 Million | $299.15 Million | ▼ -114.2% |
| 2020 | 0.14x | $43.57 Million | $314.69 Million | ▲ +128.8% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $21.83 Million | $360.72 Million | ▲ +2923.6% |
| 2018 | 0.00x | $-624.00K | $291.19 Million | ▼ -105.2% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $11.39 Million | $275.84 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $16.72 Million | $329.10 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $66.29 Million | $352.49 Million | ▲ +199.1% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | $-79.09 Million | $416.70 Million | ▼ -154.1% |
| 2013 | -0.07x | $-22.49 Million | $301.16 Million | ▼ -205.2% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $24.18 Million | $340.55 Million | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $44.26 Million | $221.64 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | $67.47 Million | $221.00 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $98.77 Million | $261.98 Million | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2008 | 0.22x | $60.80 Million | $273.05 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | $87.66 Million | $291.69 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $63.71 Million | $272.61 Million | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $71.06 Million | $229.30 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2004 | 0.54x | $131.39 Million | $245.28 Million | ▲ +1028.7% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $7.19 Million | $151.41 Million | ▼ -96.5% |
| 2002 | 1.37x | $66.23 Million | $48.23 Million | ▲ +307.2% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $13.36 Million | $39.64 Million | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2000 | 0.68x | $29.99 Million | $44.19 Million | ▲ +201.4% |
| 1999 | -0.67x | $-30.40 Million | $45.40 Million | ▼ -216.6% |
| 1998 | 0.57x | $12.00 Million | $20.90 Million | ▲ +215.8% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $3.20 Million | $17.60 Million | ▲ +164.9% |
| 1996 | -0.28x | $-700.00K | $2.50 Million | — |