JAKKS Pacific Inc (JAKK) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
JAKKS Pacific Inc (JAKK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($241.98 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See JAKKS Pacific Inc working capital to net assets to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
JAKKS Pacific Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1996–2025)
This chart shows how JAKKS Pacific Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 30 annual periods from 1996 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $241.98 Million with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. See JAKKS Pacific Inc defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for JAKKS Pacific Inc (1996–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for JAKKS Pacific Inc from 1996 to 2025, covering 30 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see JAKKS Pacific Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | $249.10 Million | $0.00 | $442.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | $240.83 Million | $0.00 | $444.87 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $196.11 Million | $0.00 | $398.95 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2022 | 98.4% | $152.48 Million | $2.47 Million | $399.30 Million | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2021 | 92.6% | $57.90 Million | $4.31 Million | $357.05 Million | ▲ +8.4 pp |
| 2020 | 84.1% | $14.68 Million | $2.33 Million | $329.37 Million | ▲ +61.6 pp |
| 2019 | 22.6% | $4.50 Million | $3.49 Million | $365.22 Million | ▼ -6.4 pp |
| 2018 | 28.9% | $51.65 Million | $36.71 Million | $342.84 Million | ▼ -40.3 pp |
| 2017 | 69.2% | $94.51 Million | $29.07 Million | $370.35 Million | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2016 | 72.0% | $135.20 Million | $37.88 Million | $464.30 Million | ▲ +6.8 pp |
| 2015 | 65.2% | $153.41 Million | $53.45 Million | $505.90 Million | ▲ +7.6 pp |
| 2014 | 57.5% | $145.08 Million | $61.60 Million | $561.78 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2013 | 55.7% | $148.69 Million | $65.92 Million | $449.84 Million | ▼ -8.7 pp |
| 2012 | 64.3% | $207.22 Million | $73.95 Million | $547.77 Million | ▼ -28.6 pp |
| 2011 | 93.0% | $393.59 Million | $27.73 Million | $615.23 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2010 | 90.7% | $412.41 Million | $38.39 Million | $633.41 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2009 | 88.5% | $372.11 Million | $42.91 Million | $634.09 Million | ▼ -6.4 pp |
| 2008 | 94.9% | $746.95 Million | $38.08 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2007 | 93.4% | $691.00 Million | $45.77 Million | $982.69 Million | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2006 | 90.1% | $609.29 Million | $60.40 Million | $881.89 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2005 | 93.1% | $524.65 Million | $36.28 Million | $753.96 Million | ▲ +3.1 pp |
| 2004 | 90.0% | $451.49 Million | $45.14 Million | $696.76 Million | ▲ +50.0 pp |
| 2003 | 40.0% | $385.95 Million | $231.74 Million | $537.36 Million | ▼ -54.6 pp |
| 2002 | 94.5% | $360.58 Million | $19.74 Million | $408.81 Million | ▲ +37.2 pp |
| 2001 | 57.3% | $244.40 Million | $104.38 Million | $284.04 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2000 | 56.5% | $204.53 Million | $88.90 Million | $248.72 Million | ▼ -11.4 pp |
| 1999 | 67.9% | $187.50 Million | $60.10 Million | $232.90 Million | ▲ +32.5 pp |
| 1998 | 35.4% | $37.80 Million | $24.40 Million | $58.70 Million | ▲ +32.4 pp |
| 1997 | 3.1% | $26.00 Million | $25.20 Million | $43.60 Million | ▼ -74.7 pp |
| 1996 | 77.8% | $11.70 Million | $2.60 Million | $14.20 Million | — |