Koss Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Koss Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Koss Corporation (KOSS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.16x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.50 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Koss Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Koss Corporation (1989–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Koss Corporation from 1989 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Koss Corporation across 38 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Koss Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Koss Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2026)
Koss Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Koss Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KOSS cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.07x | $439.21K | $6.50 Million | ▲ +306.7% |
| 2025 | -0.03x | $-214.91K | $6.57 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2024 | -0.03x | $-190.53K | $6.05 Million | ▼ -102.1% |
| 2023 | 1.47x | $10.74 Million | $7.28 Million | ▲ +1235.8% |
| 2022 | -0.13x | $-942.53K | $7.26 Million | ▼ -370.3% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $348.74K | $7.26 Million | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | $1.80 Million | $7.42 Million | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $1.41 Million | $8.16 Million | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $1.03 Million | $5.16 Million | ▲ +399.4% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $234.25K | $5.85 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $314.62K | $5.93 Million | ▲ +194.6% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | $-340.59K | $6.07 Million | ▼ -114.3% |
| 2014 | 0.39x | $3.59 Million | $9.15 Million | ▲ +55.3% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | $3.50 Million | $13.84 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2012 | 0.42x | $4.91 Million | $11.65 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2011 | 0.36x | $4.34 Million | $11.96 Million | ▲ +400.8% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $982.63K | $13.56 Million | ▼ -85.3% |
| 2009 | 0.49x | $2.38 Million | $4.84 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2008 | 0.79x | $5.34 Million | $6.76 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2007 | 0.94x | $4.91 Million | $5.24 Million | ▲ +64.9% |
| 2006 | 0.57x | $5.83 Million | $10.27 Million | ▼ -49.3% |
| 2005 | 1.12x | $7.96 Million | $7.12 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2004 | 0.98x | $4.50 Million | $4.59 Million | ▲ +115.4% |
| 2003 | 0.46x | $3.37 Million | $7.41 Million | ▼ -58.8% |
| 2002 | 1.11x | $7.80 Million | $7.05 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2001 | 1.36x | $8.92 Million | $6.56 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2000 | 1.77x | $8.05 Million | $4.55 Million | ▼ -21.1% |
| 1999 | 2.24x | $10.10 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +1072.1% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | $1.80 Million | $9.40 Million | ▲ +1248.9% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | $-100.00K | $6.00 Million | ▼ -104.8% |
| 1996 | 0.35x | $1.90 Million | $5.50 Million | ▼ -19.4% |
| 1995 | 0.43x | $1.80 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +337.1% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $500.00K | $5.10 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 1993 | 0.12x | $800.00K | $6.90 Million | ▼ -64.6% |
| 1992 | 0.33x | $2.00 Million | $6.10 Million | ▲ +553.6% |
| 1991 | -0.07x | $-600.00K | $8.30 Million | ▼ -119.5% |
| 1990 | 0.37x | $2.60 Million | $7.00 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 1989 | 0.31x | $1.90 Million | $6.10 Million | — |