LivaNova PLC (LIVN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
LivaNova PLC (LIVN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $15.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.30 Billion) in one year. See LivaNova PLC free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
LivaNova PLC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for LivaNova PLC across 33 annual periods. Also explore LIVN shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for LivaNova PLC (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LivaNova PLC. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of LivaNova PLC.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $254.30 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $183.04 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +137.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $74.91 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $69.90 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $102.54 Million | $906.31 Million | ▲ +283.9% |
| 2020 | -0.06x | $-79.40 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-91.14 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -177.0% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $120.50 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $91.30 Million | $688.60 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $90.20 Million | $635.70 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $79.68 Million | $747.28 Million | ▼ -93.1% |
| 2014 | 1.54x | $54.20 Million | $35.09 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.54x | $54.20 Million | $35.09 Million | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2012 | 2.29x | $79.05 Million | $34.48 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2011 | 2.64x | $75.03 Million | $28.44 Million | ▲ +90.5% |
| 2010 | 1.38x | $49.87 Million | $36.02 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2009 | 1.25x | $42.89 Million | $34.20 Million | ▲ +142.1% |
| 2008 | 0.52x | $24.59 Million | $47.47 Million | ▲ +220.8% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $14.46 Million | $89.53 Million | ▲ +217.9% |
| 2006 | -0.14x | $-20.69 Million | $151.05 Million | ▲ +71.5% |
| 2005 | -0.48x | $-70.88 Million | $147.67 Million | ▼ -181.2% |
| 2004 | -0.17x | $-3.97 Million | $23.26 Million | ▼ -220.2% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $3.60 Million | $25.32 Million | ▲ +208.2% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $1.28 Million | $27.68 Million | ▲ +105.4% |
| 2001 | -0.85x | $-22.95 Million | $26.87 Million | ▼ -34.2% |
| 1999 | -0.64x | $-8.18 Million | $12.85 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 1998 | -2.30x | $-14.70 Million | $6.40 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 1997 | -2.85x | $-14.80 Million | $5.20 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 1996 | -3.16x | $-12.00 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +21.1% |
| 1995 | -4.00x | $-9.60 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -84.1% |
| 1994 | -2.17x | $-6.30 Million | $2.90 Million | ▲ +49.6% |
| 1993 | -4.31x | $-5.60 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 1992 | -4.36x | $-4.80 Million | $1.10 Million | — |