LivaNova PLC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
LivaNova PLC cash flow-to-debt ratio. LivaNova PLC (LIVN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $66.59 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.32 Billion) in one year. Check LivaNova PLC (LIVN) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of LivaNova PLC (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of LivaNova PLC from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for LivaNova PLC across 33 annual periods. Check LIVN cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
LivaNova PLC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
LivaNova PLC cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LivaNova PLC. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LIVN operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $254.30 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $183.04 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +137.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $74.91 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $69.90 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $102.54 Million | $906.31 Million | ▲ +283.9% |
| 2020 | -0.06x | $-79.40 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-91.14 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -177.0% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $120.50 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $91.30 Million | $688.60 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $90.20 Million | $635.70 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $79.68 Million | $747.28 Million | ▼ -93.1% |
| 2014 | 1.54x | $54.20 Million | $35.09 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.54x | $54.20 Million | $35.09 Million | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2012 | 2.29x | $79.05 Million | $34.48 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2011 | 2.64x | $75.03 Million | $28.44 Million | ▲ +90.5% |
| 2010 | 1.38x | $49.87 Million | $36.02 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2009 | 1.25x | $42.89 Million | $34.20 Million | ▲ +142.1% |
| 2008 | 0.52x | $24.59 Million | $47.47 Million | ▲ +220.8% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $14.46 Million | $89.53 Million | ▲ +217.9% |
| 2006 | -0.14x | $-20.69 Million | $151.05 Million | ▲ +71.5% |
| 2005 | -0.48x | $-70.88 Million | $147.67 Million | ▼ -181.2% |
| 2004 | -0.17x | $-3.97 Million | $23.26 Million | ▼ -220.2% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $3.60 Million | $25.32 Million | ▲ +208.2% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $1.28 Million | $27.68 Million | ▲ +105.4% |
| 2001 | -0.85x | $-22.95 Million | $26.87 Million | ▼ -34.2% |
| 1999 | -0.64x | $-8.18 Million | $12.85 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 1998 | -2.30x | $-14.70 Million | $6.40 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 1997 | -2.85x | $-14.80 Million | $5.20 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 1996 | -3.16x | $-12.00 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +21.1% |
| 1995 | -4.00x | $-9.60 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -84.1% |
| 1994 | -2.17x | $-6.30 Million | $2.90 Million | ▲ +49.6% |
| 1993 | -4.31x | $-5.60 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 1992 | -4.36x | $-4.80 Million | $1.10 Million | — |