LivaNova PLC (LIVN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
LivaNova PLC (LIVN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $15.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.30 Billion) in one year. Explore LivaNova PLC long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
LivaNova PLC Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for LivaNova PLC across 33 annual periods. Also explore LivaNova PLC balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for LivaNova PLC (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LivaNova PLC. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is LivaNova PLC worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $254.30 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +17.2% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $183.04 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +137.3% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $74.91 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $69.90 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $102.54 Million | $906.31 Million | ▲ +283.9% |
| 2020 | -0.06x | $-79.40 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | $-91.14 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -177.0% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $120.50 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $91.30 Million | $688.60 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $90.20 Million | $635.70 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $79.68 Million | $747.28 Million | ▼ -93.1% |
| 2014 | 1.54x | $54.20 Million | $35.09 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.54x | $54.20 Million | $35.09 Million | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2012 | 2.29x | $79.05 Million | $34.48 Million | ▼ -13.1% |
| 2011 | 2.64x | $75.03 Million | $28.44 Million | ▲ +90.5% |
| 2010 | 1.38x | $49.87 Million | $36.02 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2009 | 1.25x | $42.89 Million | $34.20 Million | ▲ +142.1% |
| 2008 | 0.52x | $24.59 Million | $47.47 Million | ▲ +220.8% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $14.46 Million | $89.53 Million | ▲ +217.9% |
| 2006 | -0.14x | $-20.69 Million | $151.05 Million | ▲ +71.5% |
| 2005 | -0.48x | $-70.88 Million | $147.67 Million | ▼ -181.2% |
| 2004 | -0.17x | $-3.97 Million | $23.26 Million | ▼ -220.2% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $3.60 Million | $25.32 Million | ▲ +208.2% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $1.28 Million | $27.68 Million | ▲ +105.4% |
| 2001 | -0.85x | $-22.95 Million | $26.87 Million | ▼ -34.2% |
| 1999 | -0.64x | $-8.18 Million | $12.85 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 1998 | -2.30x | $-14.70 Million | $6.40 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 1997 | -2.85x | $-14.80 Million | $5.20 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 1996 | -3.16x | $-12.00 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +21.1% |
| 1995 | -4.00x | $-9.60 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -84.1% |
| 1994 | -2.17x | $-6.30 Million | $2.90 Million | ▲ +49.6% |
| 1993 | -4.31x | $-5.60 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 1992 | -4.36x | $-4.80 Million | $1.10 Million | — |