Alliant Energy Corp (LNT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alliant Energy Corp (LNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $368.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($17.39 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Alliant Energy Corp to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Alliant Energy Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Alliant Energy Corp across 32 annual periods. Also explore Alliant Energy Corp annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Alliant Energy Corp (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alliant Energy Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Alliant Energy Corp (LNT) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $1.17 Billion | $18.48 Billion | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $1.17 Billion | $15.71 Billion | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $867.00 Million | $14.46 Billion | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $486.00 Million | $13.89 Billion | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $582.00 Million | $12.56 Billion | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $501.00 Million | $11.82 Billion | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $660.40 Million | $11.30 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $527.70 Million | $10.64 Billion | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $983.40 Million | $9.81 Billion | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $859.60 Million | $9.31 Billion | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $871.20 Million | $8.57 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $891.60 Million | $8.42 Billion | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $731.00 Million | $7.63 Billion | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $841.10 Million | $7.50 Billion | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $702.70 Million | $6.53 Billion | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $984.90 Million | $6.14 Billion | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $657.10 Million | $6.08 Billion | ▲ +75.7% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | $319.50 Million | $5.19 Billion | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | $588.80 Million | $4.50 Billion | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $420.70 Million | $4.43 Billion | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $600.20 Million | $5.29 Billion | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $498.20 Million | $5.71 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $460.70 Million | $5.37 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $544.04 Million | $5.93 Billion | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2001 | 0.11x | $480.29 Million | $4.28 Billion | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $431.85 Million | $4.70 Billion | ▼ -17.3% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | $423.13 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -23.0% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $467.80 Million | $3.24 Billion | ▲ +204.2% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $151.20 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▼ -69.3% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $190.70 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▲ +1.2% |
| 1995 | 0.15x | $185.70 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +1.3% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $173.30 Million | $1.15 Billion | — |