Alliant Energy Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alliant Energy Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Alliant Energy Corp (LNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $368.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($17.39 Billion) in one year. Check Alliant Energy Corp (LNT) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Alliant Energy Corp (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Alliant Energy Corp from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Alliant Energy Corp across 32 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of Alliant Energy Corp to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Alliant Energy Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Alliant Energy Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alliant Energy Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see LNT operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $1.17 Billion | $18.48 Billion | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $1.17 Billion | $15.71 Billion | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $867.00 Million | $14.46 Billion | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $486.00 Million | $13.89 Billion | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $582.00 Million | $12.56 Billion | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $501.00 Million | $11.82 Billion | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $660.40 Million | $11.30 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $527.70 Million | $10.64 Billion | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $983.40 Million | $9.81 Billion | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $859.60 Million | $9.31 Billion | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $871.20 Million | $8.57 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $891.60 Million | $8.42 Billion | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $731.00 Million | $7.63 Billion | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $841.10 Million | $7.50 Billion | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $702.70 Million | $6.53 Billion | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $984.90 Million | $6.14 Billion | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $657.10 Million | $6.08 Billion | ▲ +75.7% |
| 2008 | 0.06x | $319.50 Million | $5.19 Billion | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | $588.80 Million | $4.50 Billion | ▲ +37.6% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $420.70 Million | $4.43 Billion | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $600.20 Million | $5.29 Billion | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $498.20 Million | $5.71 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $460.70 Million | $5.37 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $544.04 Million | $5.93 Billion | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2001 | 0.11x | $480.29 Million | $4.28 Billion | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $431.85 Million | $4.70 Billion | ▼ -17.3% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | $423.13 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -23.0% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $467.80 Million | $3.24 Billion | ▲ +204.2% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $151.20 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▼ -69.3% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $190.70 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▲ +1.2% |
| 1995 | 0.15x | $185.70 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +1.3% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $173.30 Million | $1.15 Billion | — |