Veradigm Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Veradigm Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Veradigm Inc. (MDRX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of September 2022, meaning its operating cash flow of $28.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($513.64 Million) in one year. Check Veradigm Inc. earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Veradigm Inc. (1998–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Veradigm Inc. from 1998 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Veradigm Inc. across 26 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Veradigm Inc. to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Veradigm Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
Veradigm Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Veradigm Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Veradigm Inc..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.24x | $115.56 Million | $487.22 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.24x | $115.56 Million | $487.22 Million | ▲ +419.8% |
| 2021 | -0.07x | $-75.43 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2020 | -0.09x | $-106.72 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -454.1% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $46.25 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $67.90 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $279.42 Million | $2.64 Billion | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $269.00 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -26.0% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $211.58 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $103.50 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +40.9% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $80.99 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -70.2% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $222.67 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2011 | 0.26x | $268.75 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +91.0% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $139.90 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2009 | 0.55x | $139.92 Million | $252.30 Million | ▲ +287.8% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | $36.08 Million | $252.29 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $36.08 Million | $252.29 Million | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $27.41 Million | $161.36 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $16.51 Million | $122.55 Million | ▲ +25.0% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $12.45 Million | $115.48 Million | ▼ -44.1% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $5.21 Million | $27.00 Million | ▲ +133.2% |
| 2002 | -0.58x | $-10.77 Million | $18.53 Million | ▲ +66.8% |
| 2001 | -1.75x | $-32.96 Million | $18.81 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2000 | -1.73x | $-24.98 Million | $14.45 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 1999 | -1.92x | $-12.70 Million | $6.61 Million | ▼ -503.5% |
| 1998 | -0.32x | $-4.20 Million | $13.20 Million | — |