Veradigm Inc. (MDRX) — Net Asset Quality Index
Veradigm Inc. (MDRX) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 69.6% as of September 2022. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $1.69 Billion minus total liabilities of $513.64 Million yields net assets of $1.18 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read Veradigm Inc. (MDRX) financial obligations for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Veradigm Inc. Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1998–2024)
This chart shows how Veradigm Inc.'s Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 26 annual periods from 1998 to 2024. As of September 2022, the index stands at 69.6%, representing net assets of $1.18 Billion against total assets of $1.69 Billion USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Veradigm Inc..
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Veradigm Inc. (1998–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Veradigm Inc. from 1998 to 2024, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check MDRX strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 67.6% | $1.02 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $487.22 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 67.6% | $1.02 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $487.22 Million | ▲ +9.6 pp |
| 2021 | 58.1% | $1.41 Billion | $2.43 Billion | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2020 | 57.1% | $1.67 Billion | $2.92 Billion | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +17.0 pp |
| 2019 | 40.1% | $1.29 Billion | $3.21 Billion | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -9.6 pp |
| 2018 | 49.7% | $1.58 Billion | $3.18 Billion | $1.60 Billion | ▲ +12.0 pp |
| 2017 | 37.6% | $1.59 Billion | $4.23 Billion | $2.64 Billion | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2016 | 43.3% | $1.66 Billion | $3.83 Billion | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -9.6 pp |
| 2015 | 52.9% | $1.42 Billion | $2.68 Billion | $1.26 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2014 | 52.1% | $1.28 Billion | $2.46 Billion | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2013 | 50.3% | $1.32 Billion | $2.62 Billion | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2012 | 54.7% | $1.28 Billion | $2.35 Billion | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2011 | 58.7% | $1.48 Billion | $2.52 Billion | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2010 | 57.2% | $1.38 Billion | $2.42 Billion | $1.03 Billion | ▼ -16.3 pp |
| 2009 | 73.5% | $700.40 Million | $952.70 Million | $252.30 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 73.5% | $700.37 Million | $952.66 Million | $252.29 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 73.5% | $700.37 Million | $952.66 Million | $252.29 Million | ▲ +7.3 pp |
| 2006 | 66.2% | $316.25 Million | $477.61 Million | $161.36 Million | ▲ +21.7 pp |
| 2005 | 44.5% | $98.42 Million | $220.96 Million | $122.55 Million | ▲ +4.0 pp |
| 2004 | 40.5% | $78.69 Million | $194.18 Million | $115.48 Million | ▼ -35.0 pp |
| 2003 | 75.5% | $83.39 Million | $110.39 Million | $27.00 Million | ▼ -6.7 pp |
| 2002 | 82.2% | $85.82 Million | $104.35 Million | $18.53 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2001 | 84.0% | $98.63 Million | $117.44 Million | $18.81 Million | ▼ -11.3 pp |
| 2000 | 95.3% | $290.98 Million | $305.42 Million | $14.45 Million | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 1999 | 91.1% | $67.40 Million | $74.01 Million | $6.61 Million | ▲ +60.9 pp |
| 1998 | 30.2% | $5.70 Million | $18.90 Million | $13.20 Million | — |