Match Group Inc (MTCH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Match Group Inc (MTCH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $194.36 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.63 Billion) in one year. Explore how much of Match Group Inc's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Match Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Match Group Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore MTCH total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Match Group Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Match Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MTCH stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $1.08 Billion | $4.71 Billion | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $932.72 Million | $4.53 Billion | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $896.79 Million | $4.53 Billion | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $525.69 Million | $4.54 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $912.50 Million | $5.26 Billion | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $802.18 Million | $4.46 Billion | ▼ -15.2% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | $937.94 Million | $4.42 Billion | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2018 | 0.30x | $988.13 Million | $3.26 Billion | ▲ +109.5% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $416.69 Million | $2.88 Billion | ▲ +28.9% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $292.38 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $349.40 Million | $2.96 Billion | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | $424.05 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $410.96 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $354.53 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $372.39 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -20.1% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | $336.11 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $328.02 Million | $859.88 Million | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2008 | 0.47x | $374.06 Million | $800.29 Million | ▲ +111.2% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $863.29 Million | $3.90 Billion | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2006 | 0.19x | $820.59 Million | $4.40 Billion | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $681.36 Million | $4.68 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2004 | 0.16x | $1.26 Billion | $7.77 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | $1.30 Billion | $7.06 Billion | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $741.56 Million | $6.66 Billion | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $298.33 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $289.94 Million | $2.22 Billion | ▼ -28.9% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $366.50 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +72.2% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | $226.80 Million | $2.12 Billion | ▲ +90.7% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $47.70 Million | $851.20 Million | ▲ +180.8% |
| 1996 | 0.02x | $12.00 Million | $601.40 Million | ▼ -84.5% |
| 1995 | 0.13x | $17.20 Million | $133.60 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $15.10 Million | $142.90 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 1993 | 0.09x | $12.70 Million | $147.30 Million | — |