Match Group Inc (MTCH) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Match Group Inc (MTCH) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 80.8% as of March 2020. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($671.47 Million) from net assets ($3.50 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See MTCH working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Match Group Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1993–2019)
This chart shows how Match Group Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 27 annual periods from 1993 to 2019. As of March 2020, the ratio stands at 80.8%, reflecting net assets of $3.50 Billion with intangible assets of $671.47 Million USD. See Match Group Inc defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Match Group Inc (1993–2019)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Match Group Inc from 1993 to 2019, covering 27 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Match Group Inc stock valuation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 94.2% | $3.94 Billion | $228.32 Million | $8.36 Billion | ▲ +11.7 pp |
| 2018 | 82.5% | $3.62 Billion | $631.42 Million | $6.87 Billion | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 2017 | 77.8% | $2.99 Billion | $663.74 Million | $5.87 Billion | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2016 | 82.6% | $2.04 Billion | $355.45 Million | $4.65 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2015 | 80.4% | $2.25 Billion | $440.83 Million | $5.21 Billion | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2014 | 75.8% | $2.03 Billion | $491.94 Million | $4.27 Billion | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2013 | 74.9% | $1.77 Billion | $445.34 Million | $4.23 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2012 | 72.7% | $1.77 Billion | $482.90 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2011 | 81.2% | $2.01 Billion | $378.11 Million | $3.41 Billion | ▼ -8.7 pp |
| 2010 | 89.9% | $2.43 Billion | $245.04 Million | $3.44 Billion | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2009 | 91.7% | $3.16 Billion | $261.17 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2008 | 91.3% | $4.45 Billion | $386.76 Million | $5.25 Billion | ▲ +7.6 pp |
| 2007 | 83.7% | $8.62 Billion | $1.40 Billion | $12.52 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2006 | 83.4% | $8.79 Billion | $1.46 Billion | $13.19 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2005 | 83.1% | $9.24 Billion | $1.56 Billion | $13.92 Billion | ▼ -9.7 pp |
| 2004 | 92.8% | $14.63 Billion | $1.05 Billion | $22.40 Billion | ▲ +87.8 pp |
| 2003 | 5.0% | $14.53 Billion | $13.80 Billion | $21.59 Billion | ▼ -14.4 pp |
| 2002 | 19.4% | $9.01 Billion | $7.26 Billion | $15.66 Billion | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2001 | 29.2% | $4.65 Billion | $3.29 Billion | $6.54 Billion | ▲ +19.6 pp |
| 2000 | 9.6% | $8.26 Billion | $7.46 Billion | $10.47 Billion | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 1999 | 5.9% | $7.26 Billion | $6.83 Billion | $9.25 Billion | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 1998 | -2.2% | $6.21 Billion | $6.34 Billion | $8.33 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 1997 | -2.3% | $1.82 Billion | $1.86 Billion | $2.67 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 1996 | -2.1% | $1.51 Billion | $1.55 Billion | $2.12 Billion | ▲ +576.4 pp |
| 1995 | -578.5% | $9.30 Million | $63.10 Million | $142.90 Million | ▲ +2110.0 pp |
| 1994 | -2688.5% | $2.60 Million | $72.50 Million | $145.50 Million | ▼ -1505.6 pp |
| 1993 | -1182.8% | $6.40 Million | $82.10 Million | $153.70 Million | — |