Match Group Inc (MTCH) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Match Group Inc (MTCH) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 80.8% as of March 2020. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($671.47 Million) from net assets ($3.50 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore net asset momentum of Match Group Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Match Group Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1993–2019)
This chart shows how Match Group Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 27 annual periods from 1993 to 2019. As of March 2020, the ratio stands at 80.8%, reflecting net assets of $3.50 Billion with intangible assets of $671.47 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Match Group Inc.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Match Group Inc (1993–2019)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Match Group Inc from 1993 to 2019, covering 27 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore MTCH capex to operating cash flow ratio to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 94.2% | $3.94 Billion | $228.32 Million | $8.36 Billion | ▲ +11.7 pp |
| 2018 | 82.5% | $3.62 Billion | $631.42 Million | $6.87 Billion | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 2017 | 77.8% | $2.99 Billion | $663.74 Million | $5.87 Billion | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2016 | 82.6% | $2.04 Billion | $355.45 Million | $4.65 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2015 | 80.4% | $2.25 Billion | $440.83 Million | $5.21 Billion | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2014 | 75.8% | $2.03 Billion | $491.94 Million | $4.27 Billion | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2013 | 74.9% | $1.77 Billion | $445.34 Million | $4.23 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2012 | 72.7% | $1.77 Billion | $482.90 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2011 | 81.2% | $2.01 Billion | $378.11 Million | $3.41 Billion | ▼ -8.7 pp |
| 2010 | 89.9% | $2.43 Billion | $245.04 Million | $3.44 Billion | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2009 | 91.7% | $3.16 Billion | $261.17 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2008 | 91.3% | $4.45 Billion | $386.76 Million | $5.25 Billion | ▲ +7.6 pp |
| 2007 | 83.7% | $8.62 Billion | $1.40 Billion | $12.52 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2006 | 83.4% | $8.79 Billion | $1.46 Billion | $13.19 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2005 | 83.1% | $9.24 Billion | $1.56 Billion | $13.92 Billion | ▼ -9.7 pp |
| 2004 | 92.8% | $14.63 Billion | $1.05 Billion | $22.40 Billion | ▲ +87.8 pp |
| 2003 | 5.0% | $14.53 Billion | $13.80 Billion | $21.59 Billion | ▼ -14.4 pp |
| 2002 | 19.4% | $9.01 Billion | $7.26 Billion | $15.66 Billion | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2001 | 29.2% | $4.65 Billion | $3.29 Billion | $6.54 Billion | ▲ +19.6 pp |
| 2000 | 9.6% | $8.26 Billion | $7.46 Billion | $10.47 Billion | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 1999 | 5.9% | $7.26 Billion | $6.83 Billion | $9.25 Billion | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 1998 | -2.2% | $6.21 Billion | $6.34 Billion | $8.33 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 1997 | -2.3% | $1.82 Billion | $1.86 Billion | $2.67 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 1996 | -2.1% | $1.51 Billion | $1.55 Billion | $2.12 Billion | ▲ +576.4 pp |
| 1995 | -578.5% | $9.30 Million | $63.10 Million | $142.90 Million | ▲ +2110.0 pp |
| 1994 | -2688.5% | $2.60 Million | $72.50 Million | $145.50 Million | ▼ -1505.6 pp |
| 1993 | -1182.8% | $6.40 Million | $82.10 Million | $153.70 Million | — |