Microvision Inc (MVIS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Microvision Inc (MVIS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.52x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-35.59 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($67.99 Million) in one year. See MVIS free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Microvision Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Microvision Inc across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Microvision Inc cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Microvision Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Microvision Inc. Check Microvision Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.23x | $-58.72 Million | $47.57 Million | ▼ -30.4% |
| 2024 | -0.95x | $-68.54 Million | $72.39 Million | ▲ +52.3% |
| 2023 | -1.98x | $-67.09 Million | $33.83 Million | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2022 | -1.51x | $-38.02 Million | $25.25 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2021 | -1.68x | $-29.40 Million | $17.47 Million | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2020 | -1.34x | $-16.07 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +11.9% |
| 2019 | -1.52x | $-24.04 Million | $15.81 Million | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2018 | -1.19x | $-22.57 Million | $18.92 Million | ▼ -91.4% |
| 2017 | -0.62x | $-15.48 Million | $24.83 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2016 | -1.17x | $-14.82 Million | $12.63 Million | ▼ -185.8% |
| 2015 | -0.41x | $-5.83 Million | $14.20 Million | ▲ +83.9% |
| 2014 | -2.55x | $-12.95 Million | $5.07 Million | ▼ -104.6% |
| 2013 | -1.25x | $-12.66 Million | $10.14 Million | ▲ +52.3% |
| 2012 | -2.62x | $-20.62 Million | $7.88 Million | ▼ -22.6% |
| 2011 | -2.13x | $-27.89 Million | $13.07 Million | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2010 | -3.45x | $-46.20 Million | $13.40 Million | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2009 | -2.72x | $-31.71 Million | $11.64 Million | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2008 | -3.35x | $-31.16 Million | $9.31 Million | ▼ -92.1% |
| 2007 | -1.74x | $-21.31 Million | $12.24 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2006 | -2.01x | $-27.06 Million | $13.46 Million | ▼ -173.8% |
| 2005 | -0.73x | $-19.73 Million | $26.87 Million | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2004 | -1.76x | $-32.28 Million | $18.35 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2003 | -3.01x | $-26.41 Million | $8.78 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2002 | -3.67x | $-28.00 Million | $7.63 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2001 | -5.07x | $-35.04 Million | $6.91 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2000 | -3.78x | $-23.15 Million | $6.13 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 1999 | -3.50x | $-16.54 Million | $4.72 Million | ▼ -118.1% |
| 1998 | -1.61x | $-6.10 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 1997 | -3.40x | $-5.10 Million | $1.50 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 1996 | -2.45x | $-2.70 Million | $1.10 Million | — |