Microvision Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Microvision Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Microvision Inc (MVIS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.52x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-35.59 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($67.99 Million) in one year. Check MVIS cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Microvision Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Microvision Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Microvision Inc across 30 annual periods. Check Microvision Inc (MVIS) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Microvision Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Microvision Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Microvision Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Microvision Inc (MVIS) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.23x | $-58.72 Million | $47.57 Million | ▼ -30.4% |
| 2024 | -0.95x | $-68.54 Million | $72.39 Million | ▲ +52.3% |
| 2023 | -1.98x | $-67.09 Million | $33.83 Million | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2022 | -1.51x | $-38.02 Million | $25.25 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2021 | -1.68x | $-29.40 Million | $17.47 Million | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2020 | -1.34x | $-16.07 Million | $12.00 Million | ▲ +11.9% |
| 2019 | -1.52x | $-24.04 Million | $15.81 Million | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2018 | -1.19x | $-22.57 Million | $18.92 Million | ▼ -91.4% |
| 2017 | -0.62x | $-15.48 Million | $24.83 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2016 | -1.17x | $-14.82 Million | $12.63 Million | ▼ -185.8% |
| 2015 | -0.41x | $-5.83 Million | $14.20 Million | ▲ +83.9% |
| 2014 | -2.55x | $-12.95 Million | $5.07 Million | ▼ -104.6% |
| 2013 | -1.25x | $-12.66 Million | $10.14 Million | ▲ +52.3% |
| 2012 | -2.62x | $-20.62 Million | $7.88 Million | ▼ -22.6% |
| 2011 | -2.13x | $-27.89 Million | $13.07 Million | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2010 | -3.45x | $-46.20 Million | $13.40 Million | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2009 | -2.72x | $-31.71 Million | $11.64 Million | ▲ +18.6% |
| 2008 | -3.35x | $-31.16 Million | $9.31 Million | ▼ -92.1% |
| 2007 | -1.74x | $-21.31 Million | $12.24 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2006 | -2.01x | $-27.06 Million | $13.46 Million | ▼ -173.8% |
| 2005 | -0.73x | $-19.73 Million | $26.87 Million | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2004 | -1.76x | $-32.28 Million | $18.35 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2003 | -3.01x | $-26.41 Million | $8.78 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2002 | -3.67x | $-28.00 Million | $7.63 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2001 | -5.07x | $-35.04 Million | $6.91 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2000 | -3.78x | $-23.15 Million | $6.13 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 1999 | -3.50x | $-16.54 Million | $4.72 Million | ▼ -118.1% |
| 1998 | -1.61x | $-6.10 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 1997 | -3.40x | $-5.10 Million | $1.50 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 1996 | -2.45x | $-2.70 Million | $1.10 Million | — |