Nathans Famous Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nathans Famous Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $949.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($71.95 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Nathans Famous Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Nathans Famous Inc (1993–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Nathans Famous Inc from 1993 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Nathans Famous Inc across 33 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Nathans Famous Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Nathans Famous Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2026)
Nathans Famous Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nathans Famous Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Nathans Famous Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.27x | $18.23 Million | $67.87 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2025 | 0.36x | $25.24 Million | $69.99 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2024 | 0.24x | $20.00 Million | $81.78 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $19.84 Million | $103.17 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $16.48 Million | $133.50 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $11.77 Million | $171.29 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $12.35 Million | $172.96 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $11.16 Million | $164.45 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $18.86 Million | $164.66 Million | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $10.41 Million | $144.62 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $12.48 Million | $143.88 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $13.29 Million | $144.57 Million | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $2.88 Million | $12.24 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2013 | 0.61x | $9.49 Million | $15.51 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2012 | 0.61x | $9.61 Million | $15.68 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2011 | 0.49x | $7.23 Million | $14.88 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2010 | 0.79x | $7.18 Million | $9.06 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $4.10 Million | $7.97 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2008 | 0.56x | $4.85 Million | $8.59 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2007 | 0.77x | $8.19 Million | $10.70 Million | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $4.06 Million | $9.38 Million | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2005 | 0.33x | $3.31 Million | $9.91 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2004 | 0.52x | $5.28 Million | $10.23 Million | ▲ +113.4% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $2.30 Million | $9.50 Million | ▲ +198.8% |
| 2002 | -0.24x | $-3.08 Million | $12.60 Million | ▼ -199.0% |
| 2001 | 0.25x | $4.15 Million | $16.80 Million | ▲ +90.4% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $1.98 Million | $15.24 Million | ▼ -90.5% |
| 1999 | 1.36x | $6.80 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +248.9% |
| 1998 | 0.39x | $2.30 Million | $5.90 Million | ▲ +182.6% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $800.00K | $5.80 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 1995 | 0.88x | $4.30 Million | $4.90 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 1994 | 0.57x | $2.70 Million | $4.70 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 1993 | 0.54x | $2.70 Million | $5.00 Million | — |