Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($66.21 Million) in one year. See Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Nathans Famous Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Nathans Famous Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore Nathans Famous Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Nathans Famous Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nathans Famous Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Nathans Famous Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.36x | $25.24 Million | $69.99 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2024 | 0.24x | $20.00 Million | $81.78 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $19.84 Million | $103.17 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $16.48 Million | $133.50 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $11.77 Million | $171.29 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $12.35 Million | $172.96 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $11.16 Million | $164.45 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $18.86 Million | $164.66 Million | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $10.41 Million | $144.62 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $12.48 Million | $143.88 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $13.29 Million | $144.57 Million | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $2.88 Million | $12.24 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2013 | 0.61x | $9.49 Million | $15.51 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2012 | 0.61x | $9.61 Million | $15.68 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2011 | 0.49x | $7.23 Million | $14.88 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2010 | 0.79x | $7.18 Million | $9.06 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $4.10 Million | $7.97 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2008 | 0.56x | $4.85 Million | $8.59 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2007 | 0.77x | $8.19 Million | $10.70 Million | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $4.06 Million | $9.38 Million | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2005 | 0.33x | $3.31 Million | $9.91 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2004 | 0.52x | $5.28 Million | $10.23 Million | ▲ +113.4% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $2.30 Million | $9.50 Million | ▲ +198.8% |
| 2002 | -0.24x | $-3.08 Million | $12.60 Million | ▼ -199.0% |
| 2001 | 0.25x | $4.15 Million | $16.80 Million | ▲ +90.4% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $1.98 Million | $15.24 Million | ▼ -90.5% |
| 1999 | 1.36x | $6.80 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +248.9% |
| 1998 | 0.39x | $2.30 Million | $5.90 Million | ▲ +182.6% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $800.00K | $5.80 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 1995 | 0.88x | $4.30 Million | $4.90 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 1994 | 0.57x | $2.70 Million | $4.70 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 1993 | 0.54x | $2.70 Million | $5.00 Million | — |