Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $949.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($71.95 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Nathans Famous Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Nathans Famous Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Nathans Famous Inc across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Nathans Famous Inc cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Nathans Famous Inc (1993–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nathans Famous Inc. Check Nathans Famous Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.27x | $18.23 Million | $67.87 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2025 | 0.36x | $25.24 Million | $69.99 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2024 | 0.24x | $20.00 Million | $81.78 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $19.84 Million | $103.17 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $16.48 Million | $133.50 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $11.77 Million | $171.29 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $12.35 Million | $172.96 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $11.16 Million | $164.45 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $18.86 Million | $164.66 Million | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $10.41 Million | $144.62 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $12.48 Million | $143.88 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $13.29 Million | $144.57 Million | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $2.88 Million | $12.24 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2013 | 0.61x | $9.49 Million | $15.51 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2012 | 0.61x | $9.61 Million | $15.68 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2011 | 0.49x | $7.23 Million | $14.88 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2010 | 0.79x | $7.18 Million | $9.06 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $4.10 Million | $7.97 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2008 | 0.56x | $4.85 Million | $8.59 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2007 | 0.77x | $8.19 Million | $10.70 Million | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $4.06 Million | $9.38 Million | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2005 | 0.33x | $3.31 Million | $9.91 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2004 | 0.52x | $5.28 Million | $10.23 Million | ▲ +113.4% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $2.30 Million | $9.50 Million | ▲ +198.8% |
| 2002 | -0.24x | $-3.08 Million | $12.60 Million | ▼ -199.0% |
| 2001 | 0.25x | $4.15 Million | $16.80 Million | ▲ +90.4% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $1.98 Million | $15.24 Million | ▼ -90.5% |
| 1999 | 1.36x | $6.80 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +248.9% |
| 1998 | 0.39x | $2.30 Million | $5.90 Million | ▲ +182.6% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $800.00K | $5.80 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 1995 | 0.88x | $4.30 Million | $4.90 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 1994 | 0.57x | $2.70 Million | $4.70 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 1993 | 0.54x | $2.70 Million | $5.00 Million | — |