Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.54 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($67.87 Million) in one year. Explore Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Nathans Famous Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Nathans Famous Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Nathans Famous Inc (1993–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nathans Famous Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.27x | $18.23 Million | $67.87 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2025 | 0.36x | $25.24 Million | $69.99 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2024 | 0.24x | $20.00 Million | $81.78 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $19.84 Million | $103.17 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $16.48 Million | $133.50 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $11.77 Million | $171.29 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $12.35 Million | $172.96 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $11.16 Million | $164.45 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $18.86 Million | $164.66 Million | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $10.41 Million | $144.62 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $12.48 Million | $143.88 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $13.29 Million | $144.57 Million | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $2.88 Million | $12.24 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2013 | 0.61x | $9.49 Million | $15.51 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2012 | 0.61x | $9.61 Million | $15.68 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2011 | 0.49x | $7.23 Million | $14.88 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2010 | 0.79x | $7.18 Million | $9.06 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $4.10 Million | $7.97 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2008 | 0.56x | $4.85 Million | $8.59 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2007 | 0.77x | $8.19 Million | $10.70 Million | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $4.06 Million | $9.38 Million | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2005 | 0.33x | $3.31 Million | $9.91 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2004 | 0.52x | $5.28 Million | $10.23 Million | ▲ +113.4% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $2.30 Million | $9.50 Million | ▲ +198.8% |
| 2002 | -0.24x | $-3.08 Million | $12.60 Million | ▼ -199.0% |
| 2001 | 0.25x | $4.15 Million | $16.80 Million | ▲ +90.4% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $1.98 Million | $15.24 Million | ▼ -90.5% |
| 1999 | 1.36x | $6.80 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +248.9% |
| 1998 | 0.39x | $2.30 Million | $5.90 Million | ▲ +182.6% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $800.00K | $5.80 Million | ▼ -84.3% |
| 1995 | 0.88x | $4.30 Million | $4.90 Million | ▲ +52.8% |
| 1994 | 0.57x | $2.70 Million | $4.70 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 1993 | 0.54x | $2.70 Million | $5.00 Million | — |