Nathans Famous Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Nathans Famous Inc tangible net worth ratio. Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 97.5% as of December 2014. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($1.35 Million) from net assets ($53.15 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check how strategically is Nathans Famous Inc's equity deployed to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Nathans Famous Inc (1993–2014)
Tangible net worth ratio of Nathans Famous Inc from 1993 to 2014. This chart shows how Nathans Famous Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 21 annual periods from 1993 to 2014. As of December 2014, the ratio stands at 97.5%, reflecting net assets of $53.15 Million with intangible assets of $1.35 Million USD. See NATH working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Nathans Famous Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1993–2014)
Nathans Famous Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 1993 to 2014. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Nathans Famous Inc from 1993 to 2014, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Nathans Famous Inc.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 96.9% | $43.90 Million | $1.35 Million | $56.13 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2013 | 96.0% | $34.15 Million | $1.35 Million | $49.66 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2012 | 95.3% | $28.84 Million | $1.35 Million | $44.52 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2011 | 96.4% | $38.08 Million | $1.35 Million | $52.96 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2010 | 96.9% | $44.31 Million | $1.35 Million | $53.37 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2009 | 96.8% | $41.85 Million | $1.35 Million | $49.82 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2008 | 95.9% | $42.61 Million | $1.75 Million | $51.20 Million | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 2007 | 89.9% | $35.88 Million | $3.63 Million | $46.58 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2006 | 86.2% | $28.05 Million | $3.88 Million | $37.42 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2005 | 86.4% | $21.36 Million | $2.90 Million | $31.27 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2004 | 81.8% | $17.35 Million | $3.16 Million | $27.58 Million | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2003 | 79.2% | $16.38 Million | $3.41 Million | $25.89 Million | ▲ +26.5 pp |
| 2002 | 52.6% | $36.15 Million | $17.12 Million | $48.74 Million | ▲ +4.0 pp |
| 2001 | 48.6% | $35.03 Million | $18.01 Million | $51.83 Million | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2000 | 42.7% | $33.35 Million | $19.09 Million | $48.58 Million | ▼ -15.8 pp |
| 1999 | 58.6% | $26.30 Million | $10.90 Million | $31.30 Million | ▲ +6.4 pp |
| 1998 | 52.1% | $23.60 Million | $11.30 Million | $29.50 Million | ▲ +4.8 pp |
| 1997 | 47.3% | $22.00 Million | $11.60 Million | $27.80 Million | ▼ -7.3 pp |
| 1995 | 54.5% | $27.50 Million | $12.50 Million | $32.40 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 1994 | 53.9% | $28.00 Million | $12.90 Million | $32.70 Million | ▲ +7.8 pp |
| 1993 | 46.1% | $24.50 Million | $13.20 Million | $29.50 Million | — |