Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 97.5% as of December 2014. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($1.35 Million) from net assets ($53.15 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Nathans Famous Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1993–2014)
This chart shows how Nathans Famous Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 21 annual periods from 1993 to 2014. As of December 2014, the ratio stands at 97.5%, reflecting net assets of $53.15 Million with intangible assets of $1.35 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Nathans Famous Inc worth.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Nathans Famous Inc (1993–2014)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Nathans Famous Inc from 1993 to 2014, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. Explore NATH capex reinvestment rate to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 96.9% | $43.90 Million | $1.35 Million | $56.13 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2013 | 96.0% | $34.15 Million | $1.35 Million | $49.66 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2012 | 95.3% | $28.84 Million | $1.35 Million | $44.52 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2011 | 96.4% | $38.08 Million | $1.35 Million | $52.96 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2010 | 96.9% | $44.31 Million | $1.35 Million | $53.37 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2009 | 96.8% | $41.85 Million | $1.35 Million | $49.82 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2008 | 95.9% | $42.61 Million | $1.75 Million | $51.20 Million | ▲ +6.0 pp |
| 2007 | 89.9% | $35.88 Million | $3.63 Million | $46.58 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2006 | 86.2% | $28.05 Million | $3.88 Million | $37.42 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2005 | 86.4% | $21.36 Million | $2.90 Million | $31.27 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2004 | 81.8% | $17.35 Million | $3.16 Million | $27.58 Million | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2003 | 79.2% | $16.38 Million | $3.41 Million | $25.89 Million | ▲ +26.5 pp |
| 2002 | 52.6% | $36.15 Million | $17.12 Million | $48.74 Million | ▲ +4.0 pp |
| 2001 | 48.6% | $35.03 Million | $18.01 Million | $51.83 Million | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2000 | 42.7% | $33.35 Million | $19.09 Million | $48.58 Million | ▼ -15.8 pp |
| 1999 | 58.6% | $26.30 Million | $10.90 Million | $31.30 Million | ▲ +6.4 pp |
| 1998 | 52.1% | $23.60 Million | $11.30 Million | $29.50 Million | ▲ +4.8 pp |
| 1997 | 47.3% | $22.00 Million | $11.60 Million | $27.80 Million | ▼ -7.3 pp |
| 1995 | 54.5% | $27.50 Million | $12.50 Million | $32.40 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 1994 | 53.9% | $28.00 Million | $12.90 Million | $32.70 Million | ▲ +7.8 pp |
| 1993 | 46.1% | $24.50 Million | $13.20 Million | $29.50 Million | — |