Nathans Famous Inc Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Nathans Famous Inc strategic asset allocation index. Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 16.3% as of December 2014. Strategic assets (PP&E of $8.68 Million plus long-term investments of $-) total $8.68 Million, measured against net assets of $53.15 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. See Nathans Famous Inc balance sheet independence to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Strategic Asset Allocation Index of Nathans Famous Inc (2000–2014)
Strategic asset allocation index of Nathans Famous Inc from 2000 to 2014. This chart shows how Nathans Famous Inc's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 15 annual periods from 2000 to 2014. As of December 2014, the index stands at 16.3%, representing strategic assets of $8.68 Million against net assets of $53.15 Million USD. Check NATH intangible-adjusted equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Nathans Famous Inc Strategic Asset Allocation Index by Year (2000–2014)
Nathans Famous Inc strategic asset allocation index by year from 2000 to 2014. The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Nathans Famous Inc from 2000 to 2014, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see NATH company net worth.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 20.7% | $9.07 Million | $8.97 Million | $100.00K | $43.90 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2013 | 18.4% | $6.29 Million | $5.79 Million | $500.00K | $34.15 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2012 | 21.4% | $6.18 Million | $6.18 Million | $- | $28.84 Million | ▲ +6.2 pp |
| 2011 | 15.2% | $5.79 Million | $5.79 Million | $- | $38.08 Million | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2010 | 12.3% | $5.47 Million | $5.47 Million | $- | $44.31 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2009 | 9.9% | $4.13 Million | $4.13 Million | $- | $41.85 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2008 | 10.4% | $4.43 Million | $4.43 Million | $- | $42.61 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2007 | 11.9% | $4.27 Million | $4.27 Million | $- | $35.88 Million | ▼ -4.4 pp |
| 2006 | 16.3% | $4.57 Million | $4.57 Million | $- | $28.05 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2005 | 21.5% | $4.58 Million | $4.58 Million | $- | $21.36 Million | ▼ -7.9 pp |
| 2004 | 29.4% | $5.09 Million | $5.09 Million | $- | $17.35 Million | ▼ -8.9 pp |
| 2003 | 38.2% | $6.26 Million | $6.26 Million | $- | $16.38 Million | ▲ +13.5 pp |
| 2002 | 24.7% | $8.93 Million | $8.93 Million | $- | $36.15 Million | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 2001 | 32.2% | $11.28 Million | $11.28 Million | $- | $35.03 Million | ▼ -9.7 pp |
| 2000 | 41.9% | $13.98 Million | $13.98 Million | $- | $33.35 Million | — |