Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Nathans Famous Inc (NATH) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 16.3% as of December 2014. Strategic assets (PP&E of $8.68 Million plus long-term investments of $-) total $8.68 Million, measured against net assets of $53.15 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. Check NATH cash and liquid asset ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Nathans Famous Inc Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2014)
This chart shows how Nathans Famous Inc's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 15 annual periods from 2000 to 2014. As of December 2014, the index stands at 16.3%, representing strategic assets of $8.68 Million against net assets of $53.15 Million USD. See financial agility of Nathans Famous Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Nathans Famous Inc (2000–2014)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Nathans Famous Inc from 2000 to 2014, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Nathans Famous Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 20.7% | $9.07 Million | $8.97 Million | $100.00K | $43.90 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2013 | 18.4% | $6.29 Million | $5.79 Million | $500.00K | $34.15 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2012 | 21.4% | $6.18 Million | $6.18 Million | $- | $28.84 Million | ▲ +6.2 pp |
| 2011 | 15.2% | $5.79 Million | $5.79 Million | $- | $38.08 Million | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2010 | 12.3% | $5.47 Million | $5.47 Million | $- | $44.31 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2009 | 9.9% | $4.13 Million | $4.13 Million | $- | $41.85 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2008 | 10.4% | $4.43 Million | $4.43 Million | $- | $42.61 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2007 | 11.9% | $4.27 Million | $4.27 Million | $- | $35.88 Million | ▼ -4.4 pp |
| 2006 | 16.3% | $4.57 Million | $4.57 Million | $- | $28.05 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2005 | 21.5% | $4.58 Million | $4.58 Million | $- | $21.36 Million | ▼ -7.9 pp |
| 2004 | 29.4% | $5.09 Million | $5.09 Million | $- | $17.35 Million | ▼ -8.9 pp |
| 2003 | 38.2% | $6.26 Million | $6.26 Million | $- | $16.38 Million | ▲ +13.5 pp |
| 2002 | 24.7% | $8.93 Million | $8.93 Million | $- | $36.15 Million | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 2001 | 32.2% | $11.28 Million | $11.28 Million | $- | $35.03 Million | ▼ -9.7 pp |
| 2000 | 41.9% | $13.98 Million | $13.98 Million | $- | $33.35 Million | — |