NeoGenomics Inc (NEO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NeoGenomics Inc (NEO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $19.96 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($565.65 Million) in one year. See financial agility of NeoGenomics Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
NeoGenomics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for NeoGenomics Inc across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of NeoGenomics Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for NeoGenomics Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NeoGenomics Inc. Check NEO cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $5.23 Million | $523.27 Million | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $7.02 Million | $735.70 Million | ▲ +461.6% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $-1.95 Million | $739.69 Million | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-65.99 Million | $742.01 Million | ▼ -153.4% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-26.72 Million | $761.50 Million | ▼ -806.7% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $1.46 Million | $294.04 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $23.37 Million | $202.10 Million | ▼ -52.3% |
| 2018 | 0.24x | $44.79 Million | $184.57 Million | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $18.04 Million | $137.81 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $21.48 Million | $150.52 Million | ▲ +189.8% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $6.39 Million | $129.84 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 2014 | 0.46x | $9.45 Million | $20.70 Million | ▲ +273.2% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $2.23 Million | $18.20 Million | ▲ +618.5% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-492.00K | $20.86 Million | ▼ -580.4% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $69.00K | $14.05 Million | ▲ +102.5% |
| 2010 | -0.20x | $-2.05 Million | $10.52 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2009 | -0.21x | $-1.50 Million | $7.30 Million | ▼ -760.9% |
| 2008 | -0.02x | $-138.31K | $5.79 Million | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2007 | -0.63x | $-2.64 Million | $4.20 Million | ▼ -179.2% |
| 2006 | -0.23x | $-693.78K | $3.08 Million | ▲ +48.1% |
| 2005 | -0.43x | $-902.05K | $2.08 Million | ▲ +32.7% |
| 2004 | -0.65x | $-658.13K | $1.02 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2003 | -0.61x | $-532.37K | $874.84K | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2002 | -0.91x | $-384.80K | $424.49K | ▼ -118.1% |
| 2001 | -0.42x | $-77.41K | $186.22K | ▲ +70.7% |
| 2000 | -1.42x | $-177.13K | $125.03K | — |